this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
172 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55266 readers
2268 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Canadians are bad, but French Canadians are just the absolute worst. Distilled colonialism shouldn't exist.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Instead of feel-good measures like this, they should TAX mosques, churches, temples, prayer sheds, whatever. (it feels good to ME, anyway)

In USA, religions pay virtually nothing, with many more benefits than any secular charity or non-profit.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There's a whole slew of non -profit orgs that would feel pain before religious ones were taxed at any reasonable level.

This does remove some direct funding, in the public funded orgs won't have to set aside building space for religion. Students will also have access to different/closer/better schooling if the Catholic schools are not allowed to select students based on their religion, which is great and I don't know how they were allowed to do that based on our Charter of freedoms

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago

i imagine a situation where churches could keep non-profit status as long as they provided some tangible service to the community. homeless feedings and things like that

[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I don't believe in any religion, don't like religion, but I also realize that it's not the governments place to tell people what they can and can't believe.

Besides that, given the specifics of this law it's rather easy to see it's not even about religion as a whole. It's just more Islamophobia.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago

it’s not the governments place to tell people what they can and can’t believe

Right, which is why they are requiring schools that receive public funds to stop discriminating against students

It’s just more Islamophobia.

Also yes and we'll work on that, but it prompted them into a sensible change.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What problem does this solve?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

It tells religious freaks that we don't have to live OUR lives based on THEIR delusions.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

By denying them theirs?

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

But you already didn't have to live your life by them...

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 0 points 10 hours ago

Yes, we do, whenever the government bows to their ludicrous demands, which is ALWAYS. Despite the fact that the Constitutionally expressly forbids it, our nation's culture and society has been crafted around Christianity, simply because these screwballs are so relentless, that lazy politicians (redundant) find it easier to give them what they want, than fight the endless culture war with them.

And since they don't have to pay taxes, or account for their fraudulent fund-raising activities, they have plenty of money to buy politicians to influence the government to favor them.

The Constitution's official stand on religion is Atheism. We need to enforce that.

[–] Napster153@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The lack of oppression, there are people who got too comfortable with the illusion of power. Hence, they have to generate misery while they still can.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago

No, I think is more absurd. They look at the US and overcorrect. There’s a reasonable middle ground where a grey area in processing works itself out after a few generations. That is totally skipped with this volatile approach.

[–] teolan@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck religion but fuck stupid laws like this. Seriously this is just as stupid as the age verification stuff everyone he is mad about.

People have the right to do their rituals if it makes them feel good...

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Not only that, but if you want to end religion, causing people to think their religion is under attack from the outside is the best way to isolate everyone in that religion and make them far more likely to stay in that religion for life.

[–] MrSmith@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Religion is cancer. Every and any.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›