this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
37 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

4798 readers
46 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hypervisor-based bypasses can 'crack' Denuvo-protected games on the day of release, marking a fundamental shift in the piracy landscape.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Oka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Its still the wild west of this invention. Theres a possibility that trying this will brick your PC.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Would it actually brick it? It seems like at worst it would be an os reinstall

I feel like denuvo is gonna start trying to release CPU microcode some day. Then we can get true bricking.

[–] who@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It seems like at worst it would be an os reinstall

It depends. Some malware would not be removed by an OS reinstall.

A few examples are mentioned here:

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/03/unkillable-uefi-malware-bypassing-secure-boot-enabled-by-unpatchable-windows-flaw/

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

As I understand it, it also leaves your system wide open to malware to just come right in. I've seen statements that it should only be used during a game session to minimize risk, but that's still a risk, and you know some people won't do that.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can never, ever trust the client. Client side anticheat is wasteful security theater.

Get your "anticheat" code off my cpu and implement actual security on your servers.

[–] Ava@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago

In this case it's discussing DRM, not anti-cheat.

[–] shani66@ani.social 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On the one hand I've already trusted fitgirl with my computer and therefore my life, on the other hypervisor seems sketch even from a trusted source.

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fitgirl is a repacker, not a cracker. When you trust a cracked game, you're not trusting her.

[–] shani66@ani.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No, you trust whoever you got it from. Either to not tamper with the game, or ensure it wasn't malware to begin with.

Edit: hm, actually, i guess that means I've only trusted fitgirl with my computer and therefore my life a handful of times.

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

I guess that is true to the extent that she isn't knowingly sharing infected files. And her track record IS stellar.