Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
No NSFW adult content
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
Huh, I really hope opensuse doesn't follow suit, and at the very least red hat is being very smart and careful with their AI use.
Seeing as IBM created Watson long before LLMs became hyped, maybe they actually have a good idea of what they're doing. Although
The focus will shift from 'AI as a tool used on occasion' to 'AI automation as a way to scale the delivery of value to customers.'
Doesn't seem like it.
It's honestly disturbing that the contamination of open source projects with LLM tool output is proceeding so fast. That nasty closed source tools trained on unethically gathered data was allowed to become a threat of this scale...
Maybe we need a movement for fully hand-coded software, as both a political statement and a baseline of quality. I doubt it will even take longer to develop and maintain, once you count all the overheads of supervising AI.
Given that code was mostly written by hand until the advent of LLM garbage that techbros are trying to make fetch...I think it is possible to do this as both to serve the multiple intended purposes. I would even suggest the teams be named after the women who made computing possible with their efforts throughout the ages! Exceptional members could belong to the Ada Lovelace, Annie Easley, Kathryn Peddrew, and Gladys West groups. As that would both honor these intelligent women who did a lot of hard work to improve computers...It would also ruffle the feathers of techbros. Which is a win-win situation for me.