Technology

well well here we go again old friend:

sudo pacman -Syu

bro... wtf should i use now??

Back to Arch??

Back to Debian??

or fuck it go TempleOS.....

However.. ive read the associated analysis of the California bill that reads directly on legislative intent:

quoting he Cali Senate Judiciary Committee analysis : file:///home/jspaleta/Downloads/202520260AB1043_Senate%20Judiciary.pdf

Why are we listening to a person who tried to link a file directly from their downloads folder?

Also the original post that the article is referencing on the fedora forums is suggesting that we remove all networking support from baseline linux as some way to comply/circumvent the law.

I'm sorry, but I just can't take anything said in that forum post seriously.

... sssssssiiiiiiiiigggggggghhhhhhhhhh

I went with a Fedora distro because the Intel GPU drivers were less of a headache. Guess I must now find another distro...

How bout

Why do some people just have the worst fucking ideas...and why is "some" starting to feel like "most"

We’re not legally required to have age verification here so if they try that shit here we’re just Gina nice to Arch/arch like :/

Oh wait, there aren't people chiming in to call me and others a fucking idiot and a stupid man child and all the other talking points for suggesting that the systemd merge was going to escalate?

Fascinating. I wonder where they all went. Maybe they're on the BSD forums now, but somehow I doubt it.

Dang, am I about to become an Arch user?

As long as I have root, I’m as old as I wanna be.

I have a feeling that a lot of those who replied have not really read the article, that contains some nuances. I do not like the idea of age verification, but the project leader's proposal is apparently not even official (and more like a hypothetical in a discussion thread on their forums.

Please read more than headlines, lol.

Ok well I suggest Fedora Project leader get fucked. Plenty of other good distros bub.

Is there a swastika in that image?

inb4

sudo usermod —birthday “1970-01-01”

Does Fedora has a Code of Conduct? Time to update it to either be

• the meaningless "Be excellent to each other!" (as seen in any open source Elon Musk project),
• or to include "protecting diverse opinions" (which is always a code word for "protecting bigotry") instead of throwing out bigots who often don't even meaningfully contribute to the project,
• or to the Ten Commandments,

if they really like the taste of the boot. Maybe they could remove "woke" elements altogether for that sweet fascist-controlled US money.

Linux Distros Could Tell Fedora To Eat Shit.

Youtube requires age verification for some content since many years.

Out of curiosity, who here is still browsing YT without verified age?

Who browses YT logged in with their google account and verified age?

Too bad we don't have pool here. I would really like to see what % of people complaining about age verification here verified their age in their google account.

For solutions that back on actually "verifying" the age by requiring credit card or government ID, those suck.

As described, this is an administrator self describing the age, which doesn't mean much to anyone except kids of people who apply parental controls to systems their kids have access to.

Accounts already require your "full name" but we don't consider that "full name verification".

This proposal seems to be in the spirit of least intrusive means to let parents opt into this stuff if they want, with no ties to identity compromising third party/state "verification".

Question is whether this sort of solution that at least gives parents some chance will satisfy the lawmakers long term. For the wave of laws now, it seems to suffice to self attest age.

Glad I ditched Fedora a while ago.

Because they are corporate-backed I can understand why Fedora would need to think about this, but I would never use them again. The surveillance state will stay the fuck out of my devices. The discussion also seems to be centered on GNOME?