this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
30 points (100.0% liked)

Science

15848 readers
63 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ever sat in a meeting where someone declares that your company is “growth-hacking” and “working at the intersection of cross-collateralization and blue-sky thinking” and called bullshit? Turns out you were right.

A new study out of Cornell University published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences found workers most excited and impressed by corporate speak may be the least equipped to make effective, practical business decisions, and it can leave companies with dysfunctional leaders.

Academically, “bullshit” is broadly defined as “a type of semantically, logically or epistemically dubious information that is misleadingly impressive, important, informative or otherwise engaging”, according to the study.

“Corporate bullshit” is a specific type of bullshit that uses puzzling corporate buzzwords and jargon and is ultimately “semantically empty and often confusing”, according to the research. It is often used by management to persuade and impress, sometimes to inflate perceptions of the company to workers and investors.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

"Leveraging"

[–] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 15 hours ago

Corporate-speak is just how people gloss over the details while making others think they know what they're talking about. It's just the evolution of the basic investor sales tactic to sell something that doesn't actually exist yet to get someone to pay for the development of that product. Only in this case they're using the tactic on each other to get people to pay them money while providing no actual value while their subordinates are forced to waste time adapting their work to those nonsense words.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Of course they are. They can't actually compete so they drink the kool-aid to justify keeping them around.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 16 hours ago

Managers love sycophants, then throw them under the bus in a bad quarter. See, good quarters are good management, bad quarters are bad workers.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

wow. I must have been a great at my job. I mean that does not logically follow but, you know, feels good to think that way.

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Crotaro@beehaw.org 4 points 17 hours ago

I believe you meant to say:

Let's double-click on this; it feels more like a parallel trajectory than a direct-impact lever.

(kindly corpofied by Kagi Translate)