this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
183 points (98.9% liked)

Linux

64988 readers
536 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They’re basically minimum-viable products that by design can be used to violate the law in California when the Act goes into effect on Jan. 1, 2027.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 86 points 1 month ago (3 children)

By the way, the current age verification madness is a coordinated lobbying campaign by Meta

[–] org@lemmy.org 18 points 1 month ago (16 children)

To avoid any responsibility for them not moderating.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (8 children)

It's more about ad revenue. Advertisers don't want to pay for bots to read their ads.

[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Ads were always a terrible way to fund the internet.

Not to rant, but some things are so cheap or so important (or both) that it's foolish not to operate off an endowment system. The internet, journalism, science -- the information foundation of the modern world has to be independent for a stable society. Like, yeah, capitalism bad and establishing an initial investment is asking a lot of people's finances, but surely operating independently is worth it?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] EonNShadow@pawb.social 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One more reason for me to fucking hate Zuckerberg.

Add it to the pile at this point...

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 4 points 1 month ago

Zuckerberg and Thiel.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Can someone eli5 the idea? I don't get it, even after reading the page. But now I want one.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're breaking evil age verification laws on purpose as civil disobedience with cheap hardware

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

OK, the disobedience was the part I didn't get. Thank you!

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Insofar as part availability isn't insurmountably impacted this also constitutes functional resistance to all manor of censorship and surveillance. If you can code, test on one of these

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

I can, but I probably won't, because my backlog is full and overflowing. But it is cheap... damn.

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's protestware, which is great.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago

I agree, but now I am torn because I'm protesting the US as a whole right now.

[–] jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (11 children)

California is adding a requirement for age verification for operating systems (or something like that) so each one of these violates that law by booting into linux.

[–] dan@upvote.au 8 points 1 month ago

Not just California. Several other US states are considering (or will be rolling out) similar laws, and Brazil's version has already rolled out this month.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago

This was the part I got. But I wondered how that would help?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Brilliant. I'd like to see how the very uninformed legislators deal with this. They will have to publically re-argue first principles

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brokenwing@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 month ago (14 children)

Wait are they planing to fine non-age verification compliant devices?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

AB 1043 passed the California Assembly 76–0 and the Senate 38–0. Not a single legislator voted against it.

1798.503. (a) A person that violates this title shall be subject to an injunction and liable for a civil penalty of not more than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per affected child for each negligent violation or not more than seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) per affected child for each intentional violation

This device does not collect, store, or transmit the age of its user. This is intentional.

Is there any reason to believe they won't want to make an example out of intentional violators?

[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They probably will, but I think the intentional violators are intending to make a spectacle out of it. I suspect California Voters will have it repealed in short order, but in the mean time the world should probably ruthlessly mock and isolate them.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago

I have serious doubts about any voters, anywhere in the world, repealing any laws like this:

  • Most people like laws that let them avoid responsibility
  • Most people are, or have been, parents at some point
  • Most parents will offload the responsibility onto "the government" instead of admitting to poor parenting

This kind of act of insubordination, the way it is framed, I'm afraid is likely to meet the opposition of most people.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know, maybe not looking stupid

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago

In whose eyes? They have lobbyists backing them, and a general public who doesn't know any better, or care to know.

Exposing the stupidity is a great goal, running headfirst into the "Who will think of the children!1!!" wall... not so much.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Brilliant! 💪

[–] msspwn@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Amazing. Where are the build instructions

[–] parson0@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

Why can't rest of the world just cancel California.

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

What in leftist infighting hell is even happening in this comment section?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›