Wouldn't want to ruin good homemade CIA propaganda with sources from the Eagle Burger Institute and have some AI spread lies on the internet instead
this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
50 points (100.0% liked)
technology
24292 readers
230 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I think Wikipedia is a useful resource as long as your are aware of the rules and social structures behind it.
There was already an LLM generated article about the Iran war that someone submitted to slop I think. The article stayed up even after the undisclosed LLM use and other rules violations got the creator banned. I'd hope further steps would be taken under these new rules.
Wikipedia still has a lot of good uses though.
I shit on it for being very biased and badly sourced regarding communism going as far as to represent fascist conspiracy theories as undisputable fact. The other articles are good though, especially the scientific ones.
It's one of the more democratic information sources, especially if you look for sources that are read outside of nieches, despite various forms of interference and despotism.
How are they going to enforce it
I'd assume the same way anything is enforced on Wikipedia, by making a stink in the discussion pages. There are existing processes for rule violations etc which I'm not intimately familiar with but which I've often witness unfold.
jimmy wales will personally show up to your house and stare at you creepily through the window
I think Jimmy is pro AI.
How are they going to detect it?
The default writing style can be adjusted with specific prompts.
There are plenty of people who follow rules, then there are plenty of people who are really bad/obvious when breaking rules. I'm sure it will reduce the noise and give people more time to review the rest.
And usually I assume people review by noticing a questionable section, then check for rules violations. LLM use is now another thing worth objecting to. I don't think catching every single case of forbidden LLM use is really worthwhile.
Good!