this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
16 points (90.0% liked)

Technology

42526 readers
157 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] XLE@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Bernie Sanders has unfortunately been duped into thinking AI is what the evangelists (tech CEOs and doom evangelists, including the cult leader Eli Yudkowsky) have told him about it.

Here (Twitter) is a video from Bernie's office that starts with a cult leader telling Bernie that AI will kill humanity. It is presented uncritically.

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Also, LLMs are not AI (in the sense that most people would deem meaningful): there's no reasoning involved, just a convincing illusion of it, served by extensive knowledge compaction and next token prediction. That is not to say that LLMs are useless, or that the sort of all-powerful AI people fantasize about cannot exist (I really don't know, no people do). That is to say that it's not for now, and that before it happens, we will see another long AI winter before the emergence of something fundamentally more convincing than LLMs.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 9 hours ago

LLMs are highly impressive text generators, amazing facsimiles of human writing and wholly unsuited to anything involving semantic understanding and critical thought. You cannot generate facts, and it doesn't understand how the patterns it analyses and reproduces relate to actual concepts or things, but they're extremely "knowledgeable" about those patterns.

They're a technological marvel, relentlessly abused by grifters posing as prophets to scam the gullible.

Unfortunately, the gullible are executives and representatives.