this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
33 points (100.0% liked)

World News

54843 readers
3772 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Saudi Arabia reserves the right to act militarily against Iran and any trust with Tehran has been shattered, the Saudi foreign minister said early on Thursday, after Riyadh was targeted by Iranian ballistic missiles.

Iran accused Israel of striking its ‌facilities in the huge South Pars gas field on Wednesday in a major escalation in the U.S.-Israeli war that sent oil prices shooting higher, and retaliated by vowing attacks on oil and gas targets throughout the Gulf, firing missiles at Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

In the harshest comments to come out of the Gulf kingdom in nearly three weeks of war, Farhan accused Iran of premeditated hostile actions against its neighbours, ⁠both directly and via an array of regional proxies which he urged Tehran to reign in.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They'll wait until it's bombed flat, then kill some civilians.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk -1 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Is Saudi Arabia allowing strikes from bases on their soil into Iran? If not, then from a legal/moral point of view Saudi Arabia is completely in the right, since Iran has attacked Saudi Arabia first.

[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yes their airspace and US military bases are used for offensive attacks on Iran. These US puppet state monarchries are neutered. Switzerland, Spain, Japan, even France those are christians and athiests they stood up to Trump and decalred they will not allow the US to use their airports, military bases or even airspace for attacks on Iran just for the US to allow them to rule in an absulote monarchy dictatorships. These neutered gulf dictatorships meanwhile only have the power to jail and torture their citizens and stay in power licking Trump boots even after paying him trillions in investments, bribes and board of peace memberships and in "defence" contracts

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 1 points 44 minutes ago

Yes their airspace and US military bases are used for offensive attacks on Iran.

Source?

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That stance makes absolutely no sense. If a nation is invading you the military bases belonging to that nation are valid legal targets.

"Oh but don't worry these bases aren't being used to attack you, they just hold a bunch of personnel and equipment that we can easily move to use against you, but you're definently not allowed to attack those"

Of course to get to those they must also trespass in Saudi Arabia's airspace which then justifies Saudi Arabia retaliating against Iran. War is messy like that

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

That stance makes absolutely no sense. If a nation is invading you the military bases belonging to that nation are valid legal targets.

Well yes and not - but that is how international law works. As an analogy, Russia is not attacking tanks heading through the EU to Ukraine, before they pass the border into Ukraine.

There has to be a consensus of what constitutes a legal target. Or the whole world would be anarchy.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I mean they are all evidence suggests it but even if not directly attack from the bases in their country they are allowing the us to run radar and electronic warfare and refueling and on and on no even question about that.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Good content but that period needs friends. It's too much sentence for just one break.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 0 points 4 hours ago

radar and electronic warfare and refueling and on and on

NATO is sending radar intel to Ukraine too - is NATO waging war on Russia? By international law, I would say not.

Russia is also sending satellite into to Iran. Also not an act of war.

It seems quite important to me that there is a consensus on what constitutes an act of war. Otherwise everything becomes a potential act of war, with corresponding escalation risks.