this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
101 points (99.0% liked)

Games

47259 readers
2857 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A judge ruled yesterday that Krafton improperly fired Gill in 2025, and ordered that he be restored as CEO of Unknown Worlds.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Guitar@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you want to help fuck over Krafton and support the devs, buy the game. The judge extended the deadline for Unknown Worlds to earn the $250 million payout until late September. That payout was the whole reason Krafton put together this scheme in the first place. You will actually hurt Krafton more if they have to pay out that $250 million versus not buying the game at all. Not to mention, UW does good work and absolutely deserves it.

[–] Fafa@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I guess ill also wait for first reviews. Still want to have a good experience even though I want to support the devs.

[–] Guitar@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

That's fair, keep in mind it's releasing in early access. So you may want to wait for a bit before diving in. Though they originally planned to release in early access mid last year, so its probably fairly close to the final product.

[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Soooooo by purchasing a copy of Subnautica 2 we could make a big, shitty company shell out $250 mil to the developers?

Not interested in the game, but I do like the sound of that.

[–] TRBoom@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago

That's my read as well. I really liked the first one and if I can make this dick feel like he lost at the same time...

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Huh. I wasn’t going to buy it at all. Now, I’m not sure. Damn.

[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm torn because it would still put money in that shitty company's pocket.

[–] guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It depends, if the game never makes more than $250,000,000 in sales, then I’d it’s good! Because the parent company had to give UW way more money than they made for them

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean... surely they have to make more than 250,000,000 in sales to justify the original bonus being 250,000,000 in the first place.

No?

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Krafton paid half a billion for Unknown Worlds. The 250 million bonus was in addition to that. Including operational costs and salaries, they need to make back almost a billion to break even.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They not sacking the Krafton CEO who used ChatGPT to strategise how to cheat the devs out of their money, overruled his legal team and has embarrassed the company?

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

All PR is good PR I guess. He did successfully promote Subnautica 2, judging by the reactions in this thread. Without this scandal I would have never known a sequel was on the way.

[–] albbi@piefed.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

One of the top lemmy posts of all time is a warning not to buy Subnautica 2.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] albbi@piefed.ca 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Thanks. So it seems like the best case scenario for the shitty publishing corporation is to make $249 million?

And the best case for the devs who were fired is to make exactly 250 million and not any more?

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Maybe I didn't scroll far enough, but it looks a lot like all the top lemmy posts are about Lemmy or about how Reddit sucks.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Without this scandal I would have never known a sequel was on the way.

Makes me wonder if this might actually all just be kayfabe to drum up free publicity...

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago

Hanlon's razor applies here. It could be, but I doubt it. It's just yet another stupid CEO who thinks he, and his AI chatbot, are smarter than everyone else.

However, internet users are also stupid. They think buying the game will hurt them. In what world does that make sense? They company made the purchase with this deal, assuming they'd pay it. They expect it to make them money. The CEO just thought he could just squeeze extra profit out of it by getting out of the deal. It doesn't mean they'll lose money by paying it. It just means the game is making them a ton of money, but they'll have to give some of it back to the studio.

[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

"We look forward to working with Ted Gill", sure you fucking do. Do those people take us for absolute idiots? Everybody knows they'll just try to fuck Unknown Worlds over at the first chance they get.

Love Subnautica but I'm not giving Krafton a single cent.

Krafton a single

Krafton signals

People gotta be doing this on purpose

[–] Guitar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You'd hurt Krafton more if Unkown World earns enough revenue to trigger the $250 million payout. Obviously a single word from Krafton can't be trusted, but that's all the more reason to hit them with this. I'm all for not giving money to a shitty company. But the payout was the whole reason they tried to pull this hostile takeover shit in the first place. If Krafton doesn't end up having to pay that money to UW, then it's a victory for them. If you really want Krafton to be punished, buy the game and make them pay, literally. If UW has all that money at the end of this, it will put them in a stronger position to not get pushed around by Krafton. Ultimately, Krafton put itself in this position because they made a deal they regretted, and tried to weasel out of it. Don't let them succeed if you hate them and love Subnautica.

[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

How much would $250 million really hurt Krafton in comparison to the money they'd make?

[–] Guitar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Enough that they were willing to risk doing this to their reputation against the advice of lawyers. So I'd say pretty damn bad. But if you decide it's not where you wanna put your money, that's fair too.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago

But it also helps the game sell better. I'd bet, if the game does well, Kraft on will make far more than that back. They didn't purchase the company to lose money. They just thought they could get out of paying that money and make more profit. It's not that they'd not make a profit by avoiding this, just less.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 3 points 1 day ago

Their 2024 gross revenue was about $1.9 billion, so $250 million would be over 13% of their total annual revenue

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dude this publisher is totally dogshit. I'm torn between paying for it to support the dev or not.

[–] AcesFullOfKings@feddit.uk -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I don't understand all these comments where people are trying to decide whether to "support the developer" or "screw a huge company". Like, they do not care one bit about a single sale. It makes no difference.

Here's my thought process: I loved subnautica 1. Below Zero was decent. I'd like to play the next one, therefore I will buy it. I give zero shit about the politics and lawsuits involved. I like the game so I'll buy it. Any further mental gymnastics is just pointlessly torturing yourself.

Ah no, buddy, you misunderstand me. I'm gonna play this game, my experience on the previous ones parallels yours closely. I'm deciding if I'm gonna pay for it or not.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago

I’d like to play the next one, therefore I will buy it.

There be other options, matey.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Eh, I'll wait for reviews at least. It wouldn't be the first sequel to drop the ball. I don't have any loyalty to a company. Even though I think every game they've made, from Natural Selection 2 on, including Moonbreakers (even if it didn't do well it was the best model painting simulator I've seen), has been worth playing, that doesn't mean it always will.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And what happens to the denier of reality? That dude should be in jail.

[–] peacefulpixel@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

i still remember this game having AI Generated assets. that's not exactly something i can look past. how ironic that the devs were taking an environmentalists angle for the first game, now we're here

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 day ago

Ofc its a company with "AI first" philosophy

[–] Guitar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If there are any AI generated assets, and I don't believe there are, they certainly aren't anything substantial. The devs have been showing off their work for months. At a minimum, the creatures, vehicles, bases, and writing is all created by humans. I know Krafton claimed a few months ago they were gonna start putting AI assets in their games, but from everything I've seen of Subnautica 2, it does not have AI generated assets. If you have a source that says otherwise, I'd be interested to see it.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IMO, ai-generated assets are not a deal-breaker, especially if it's done in moderation. For example, using AI to generate the texture for a human-made 3D model.

If major portions of the game are AI-generated, that's going to be terrible. But if they're just using it as a shortcut to fill in some of the minor details, that's probably fine.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you're okay with AI taking texture maker's jobs but not 3D modeller's?

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't give a shit about anybody's job. I'm just talking about what AI might or might not be able to do a decent job of and not ruin the product.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh you’ll care if it comes after your job.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago

It already has.

Full nihilist mode here, bruh.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Success corrupts I suppose. Or is it another of those games with a completely different team doing the sequal?

[–] peacefulpixel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

from what i recall which may be wrong, the only people of the original subnautica team that were fired were the original 3 founders of the team. the rest of the team is in tact i believe