this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
48 points (94.4% liked)

politics

28884 readers
1816 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

Ugh, Sinema. Fucking traitor to the working class and a stain on the social work profession. She was even homeless as a child, allegedly. Yet she licked those government boots and took that corporate money. Fuck her.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I'm the only one who doesn't give a fuck about politicians escapades? as long as everyone who fucks is a consenting adult IDGAF. that's like bullshit telenovela drama. as long as they do their job, their bullshit shouldn't be my bullshit.

chances are I have actual grievances with them about their building policies. how they cum isn't one of my grievances (as long as it involves only consenting adults)

[–] 843563115848@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

Who?

NVM

IDGAF

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Two things. First, Kirsten Sinema can get fucked, she seems to have screwed every person who's ever come into contact with her, especially her constituents in Arizona. But second, this is the most ridiculous lawsuit I've ever heard of.

North Carolina is one of a handful of states that allow jilted spouses to sue for “alienation of affection” to seek damages from a third party responsible for the breakup of their marriage.

This is the kind of corn fried bullshit one can expect from these fucking Southern States. Marriage isn't sacred, it's not even all that important. I think if we reduced it down to contract law like it's should be, things would be a lot simpler. In fact limiting marriage contracts to 20, 30, or 40 year lengths and adding in specific stipulations would probably improve a lot of people's experience with it.

P.S. also a not quite third thing. Her lawyer's last name is Epstein. And I just realized how much it really must fucking suck for anybody who has that last name right now.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I partially disagree with your second part but not because of any sacredness of marriage, but because once in a marriage a lot of finances and life decisions are made that can fuck a person's life if suddenly up rooted. I feel like this law is an improvement on alimony because it's a one time payment and the person that fucked it has to pay.

Really, I just like when shitty people get their comeuppance.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know how these alienation of affection laws work, but I would hope the spouse involved in the affair would also have to pay since it's not like they don't have any agency, either.

And yeah, I get your point about the marriage thing - if one of the people in the marriage decides to go fucking around, their spouse should have the option to cut that short without being buried in bills for it - the cheater should have to pay it all, and if the person they cheated with is also made to pay, that make sense, too.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Admittedly, I also don't know the law to the letter. I'm basing some of my opinion on OP saying spouse in their comment.

It's one thing when the outside cheater doesn't know that their fuck buddy is married, and it's another when they do know. If you willingly engage in an action that destabilizes someone's life because you want to get your fuck on, there should be monetary consequential.

I have no patience for cheaters, especially in a monogamous relationship. Again not because of sanctity of marriage,but because of the betrayal of trust and monetary consequences.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Those states are: North Carolina, Mississippi, South Dakota, New Mexico, Utah, and Hawaii

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 17 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Why is this bitch in the news

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

She's one of those politicians that seemingly has no support from anyone and infuriates quite a lot of people.

Once she got into office and started pulling a lot of her shit, Democrats were pretty much done with her. Since she had a "D" after her name, no Republican was going to support her from the jump, of course.

Something tells me she is absolutely toxic to deal with on a personal level, too.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago (2 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

With nearly everything that woman did, you can just tell she thinks she is really quite something.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago

She was acting out the last nail going into the coffin of her career.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Heather Ammel contends in a lawsuit that she and husband Matthew had “a good and loving marriage” and “genuine love and affection”

That woman Heather Anmel is insane, her husband was unfaithful and that is 100% on him. Sinema never promised to be faithful to a woman she probably never met, but the husband of the crazy wife obviously did.

blames Sinema for the marriage breakup.

The marriage probably wasn't as loving as she thought.

North Carolina is one of a handful of states that allow jilted spouses to sue for “alienation of affection”

Absolutely insane, a third party that is with someone who is married never promised anything, and hence also didn't break a promise. It's insane how people are so dense, and blame anybody else but the person they are married to that actually made a promise.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago

These are remenents of times when divorce needed a reason. Common law stuff.

The issue with holding the spouse responsible is it can keep someone in an abusive relationship so we got rid of those barriers.

There are only a few of these cases a year and they almost never lead anywhere. Most judges feel the same way as you on it.

A quick search shows that North Carlonia is the only state that really has a lot of activity around it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alienation_of_affections

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 3 points 7 hours ago

Absolute Sinema