this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
2 points (62.5% liked)

UK Politics

5394 readers
303 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Very funny that they dug this up the day the Mandelaon files dropped. I can't wait to hear about the hypnboobs thing the next time Labour fuck up.

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

The fact that this is really the only thing they've got on him as well.

Straws have never been clutched like this.

[–] scrchngwsl@feddit.uk 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's clear that he did, in fact, believe that he could hypnotise women's breasts bigger. And then backtracked when he became a politician and realised this would look bad for him.

Right now I would still vote for the Greens but my god can't we have someone with good policies AND who has never tried to hypnotise women's breasts bigger??

PS. Here is what his website looked like a year after the Sun article was written: https://web.archive.org/web/20141025071852/http://www.zackpolanski.com/page/1/. The main page doesn't advertise breast enlargement, but the blog does mention positively the Sun article. He clearly wasn't ashamed of it, or trying to "defend" himself from misrepresentation. I think we can safely conclude that the guy genuinely believed in hypnotherapy -- him being a professional hynotherapist charging £200 a session and all -- and that this extended to breast enlargement. Whatever he currently believes, I don't like the left denying this apparently basic truth.

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh ok so he was a professional hypnotherapist grifting about making big booba with his mind waves.

I mean shrug-outta-hecks a man’s gotta make money some way, I guess? At least it’s not him having poor judgement and being wishy washy on the topic of Corbyn being an anti-semite, which he was

[–] scrchngwsl@feddit.uk 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What do you mean by that last bit? Was he wishy washy on Corbyn's anti-semitism? I saw that he was wishy washy on the "Zionism is racism" motion.

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 1 points 7 hours ago

He lent tacit support to the accusations iirc

[–] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 3 points 9 hours ago

Lmao what the fuck?

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If believing in hypnotherapy for breast augmentation is the worst dirt labour are digging up on him then I am unfazed

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)
  1. Is caught on tape making fraudulent claims to someone he was told was medically vulnerable.
  2. Lies about apologising
  3. Not only is there no record of the apology, a week after he supposedly did this, he was publicly claiming that not only were his fraudulent claims truthful, he had done it to other vulnerable people too.

And some people call this leadership material.

Not only was he lying then, but he seems to still be lying about it now. That’s a problem.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 7 hours ago

Its certainly a problem, but its a lot less damning than what you could say for other parties' leadership