Short answer is no, but you can buy a card holder that integrates into the case: https://shop.fairphone.com/shop/fairphone-6-card-holder-1895?category=5&color=188
I thought I'd miss not having contactless phone payments but actually the card holder thing is fine.
He was redirected to Sainsbury's, which apologised and offered him a £75 shopping voucher.
Get absolutely fucked Sainsbury's, what a joke. "We're sorry we called you a criminal and chucked you out of our shop, here's some fake toy money you can only spend at the same place we humiliated you in."
I know I'm a weirdo in this regard but I would voluntarily get a digital ID from the government. I can see how it would be beneficial in accessing public services but also private services too. I use the Government Gateway account for a wide range of things already including state benefits and self assessment, and it would be great if I could use the same account to prove my identity when signing up for bank accounts.
Right now, to prove my identity to my bank, I have to take a photo of my driving licence, and a video of my face. Then, in probably the most humiliating and degrading thing I have ever been asked to do by my phone, I have to SMILE AT THE CAMERA in order to trigger a selfie to be taken.
My driving licence, video and selfie-with-enforced-smile is then sent to a company that uses "AI" to determine my identity. Now, I know that they do not always use AI to do this, because my wife used to work for this company, and she spent all day looking at people's photos and driving licences to see if they matched. They were able to provide 24/7 service by having large offices in 3 different time zones, so that an 8-10 hour work day would span the full 24 hour day.
That entire process for verifying my ID with my bank is way more dystopian, alienating and humiliating than signing up for a digital ID with the government. So while I don't support mandatory ID, I do support a government issued ID that was widely recognised by banks, workplaces, estate agents, and other private institutions that are necessary for modern life.
The decision to ban away fans from this game is starting to look more and more incompetent. I have no idea if it was the correct decision, and I don't trust the judgement of the people who made that decision. Clearly they did not do adequate investigation.
I said to myself about 20 minutes in that I'd take a point. I never really wavered from that, even after the red.
Why oh why can't we just get a nice season without any injury setbacks?!
This is a good summary. At this point I am too deeply invested in to NextCloud to switch to a different thing, as I've switched my whole family off OneDrive now and I just cba to go through that again. I can handle it being dogshit and I've got used to it's bugs - a form of stockholm syndrome. I suspect a lot of people are similar to me - we use NextCloud because it's the biggest name and has been around forever, not because it's what we want.
Anyway, performance is clearly a problem, and has been since I started on OwnCloud 10 years ago. I wish the devs would do something to improve it but again, having used it for 10 years, I know that they won't. When it finally blows up I'll move to something else I guess.
Until verification is complete, access to [social features] will be limited to friends only
don't threaten me with a good time
Calling that shopping centre "iconic" and "legendary" is hilarious.
The proposals have received 784 responses from the public, comprising 105 objections, 637 responses in support and 42 neutral comments.
637 out of 784 in support is pretty overwhelming.
Octopus Energy are having a free hour of electricity today, so I turned the heat pump and electric heater on just now. It got down to 19.5 in the morning, which is far too cold for me...
The OSA should have been explicitly worded to exclude organisations like the Wikimedia Foundation from its scope. Clearly the intent of the law was not to clamp down on the Wikimedia Foundation, so the law should have been written such that the Wikimedia Foundation fell clearly outside of its scope. It's just very poorly drafted.
I've read the act and it's not clear at all. There is a legal risk if you run a small site about a legal subject with a comment section or forum now that didn't exist before, which was not the stated intent of the law, and which results from the legislation being poorly drafted.
still can't believe Martinelli missed that. Or rather that Kelleher saved it. I would put money on him slotting that home every time.