this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
20 points (83.3% liked)

Climate

8420 readers
1115 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18107@aussie.zone 27 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

TLDR: Climate change is reducing the amount of available food for the bears.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So... The obvious, unsurprising reason why bears are attacking...

[–] bonenode@piefed.social 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

No, you see, the headline says it is strange so you are obviously wrong.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 4 points 15 hours ago
[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Clickbait headlines often have dull content behind them it seems.

I'm tired of articles turning into guessing game, those headlines are basically saying "hey guess what's this article is about!". No thank you, I'll pass. News isn't a lottery game.

[–] GameOverFlow@lemmy.zip 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Its always food, isnt it? 

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 5 points 15 hours ago

Update: it indeed was food; or put better, the lack thereof for the bears.

[–] higgsboson@piefed.social 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Xiao’s study helps fill in the gaps. By analyzing climate and satellite data, Xiao found that a weather anomaly tied to climate change may explain the deadly surge.

The details are complex, but the new paper — as well as a much lengthier, unpublished study that’s currently under peer review — suggests that climate change is weakening winds, known as the westerlies, that bring dry air into Japan and prevent moist air from the Pacific from flooding in. That’s making northern Japan cloudier.

With more clouds, less light reaches the forest. And this is key: Without light, forests fail to produce young shoots, nuts, and other foods that bears rely on, the study argues. That leaves bears hungry and likely to venture into human settlements in search of sustenance. Last year, Akita, the epicenter of bear attacks, “endured one of its darkest springs in recent memory,” the authors write, and beech trees in northern Japan produced almost no nuts.