this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
26 points (90.6% liked)

Videos

17968 readers
337 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed
  9. AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Something I've been thinking about:

Tall people have a biological advantage in certain sports, like basketball. That means they should be banned, right? Just based on the same logic (that biological advantages are unfair) then what's the difference?

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dutch people should be banned from playing basketball.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There are only two things I can't stand in this world. People who are intolerant of other people's cultures. And The Dutch.

But seriously though, weirdly, I don't think the dutch are big basketball players. I can't think of a single Dutchman currrently in the NBA.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 days ago

I was joking with my other comment, but in some sports they solved this by having people only compete with others in their (weight) class. If this wasn't about appression, this would be the obvious proposal to abolish gendered sports.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

Who do we need to win against?

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

I dig Emma Vigeland. She's got a good stance and mind. She used to be on TYT and got beef with them at some point, which was a loss for TYT, I think.

Her points here are salient. To paraphrase one point, she's saying a voter my have the notion that a biologically born male transitioned to female might have a physical advantage in sports against biologically born females, and a voter may disapprove of that pairing in a match, but that stance doesn't mean "I hate Trans people" not will it cause them to vote against trans rights. However, Schumer or Jeffries don't have the nuance to understand that and drive the Democrats to push otherwise.