this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
112 points (97.5% liked)

World News

54580 readers
2603 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A U.S. intelligence assessment completed shortly before the United States and Israel launched a war in Iran had determined that American military intervention was not likely to lead to regime change in the Islamic Republic, according to two people familiar with the finding.

The National Intelligence Council’s assessment in February concluded that neither limited airstrikes nor a larger, prolonged military campaign would be likely to result in a new government taking over in Iran, even if the current leadership was killed, according to the two people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the classified report.

The determination undercuts the administration’s assertion that it can complete its objectives in Iran relatively quickly, perhaps in a matter of weeks. The administration has asserted that it was not seeking regime change in Iran, even as the strikes have taken out many figures in the Iranian leadership and President Donald Trump considers whom he would like to see lead the country.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

The whole goal is to destroy their military capabilities so Israel can do whatever they want unopposed.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

It is kind of funny that Iran already replaced Khomeini with another Khomeini. Except this one is extra shitty, and now also extra pissed off too.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 12 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Khamenei. Khomenei was another dude, replaced by Khamenei. Then Khamenei was killed and was replaced by Khamenei Jr.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Are all those actually different names, and not just varying latin alphabet transliterations of the same farsi word?

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Yes, the first one was a different family, unrelated to the second and third, who are father and son.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 5 hours ago
[–] GuyFawkes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

Only funny if their first and only target is Mar A Lago.

[–] kboos1@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Trump's code name should be Blunt Knife because he's about as useful as one.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

The one you could use where I am from is "one hand clap"

Just as effective as clapping with one hand.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 11 points 8 hours ago

We call people like that "bull tits".

"That boy's about as useful as tits on a bull."

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 3 points 7 hours ago

Why do the press think they wanted regime change? It's iran. It's their dream just to blow the place up.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 6 points 9 hours ago

But of course Trump and his Merry Men knew better than the unmatched intelligence and military apparatus they have around to call upon.

[–] homes@piefed.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

They changed leadership. It’s basically the same guy, just his son. The exact same flavor of religious crazy, just younger.

This analysis is useless

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

That's not what "change in leadership" means; it means different governments with different agendas coming into power. That will not happen as a result of this war.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That is however exactly what Donald Trump said leadership change in Venezuela meant.

Very different situations. Maduro was dictator of a relatively smaller nation that would not be the same without him there, while Iran is larger, more powerful, and has a leadership structure less dependent on one person. Even then, kidnapping Maduro does not mean his more pro US replacement is a reliable ally. She could be overthrown and is limited in how much she can help them.

[–] homes@piefed.world -5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Just because you have your own special definition of the phrase doesn’t mean that “a change in leadership“ means the same for everyone else.

A different person is now in leadership of Iran. That is a change of leadership,

Stop being weird about this

Edit: sorry not sorry that facts piss you off. Deal with it, assholes.

Says the person who misses the bigger picture. The US and Israel don't want to national build, they just want Iran's military to be weaker. They know that installing a long lasting puppet would be next to impossible, so they instead want to disarm their enemy.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I think you're taking the phrase more literally than most people would.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 2 points 7 hours ago

Man, that would really bum out Trump if he could read his briefings.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago

I see that Trump & Co. are vibe warring again.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Krasnov trusts the GRU and the FSB over his own CIA and ODNI. Of course this doesn't matter.