this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
56 points (98.3% liked)

World News

54580 readers
2100 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Great Britain has only two days of fossil gas stored after a decline in energy reserves, as more tankers carrying liquefied natural gas (LNG) are diverted from their course to Europe towards Asia because of the Iran war.

Great Britain had 6,999 gigawatt hours (GWh) of fossil gas stored on Saturday, according to figures from National Gas, which owns and operates the gas national transmission system. This compares with 9,105 GWh a year earlier.

Maximum capacity is 12 days of gas, and current storage levels equate to under two days of reserves, leading to concerns that Great Britain could run out of gas if the crisis in the Middle East escalates further.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

So is this a lie then?

A spokesperson for the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: “It is categorically untrue that the UK only has access to two days of gas supply. We have a diverse energy mix and are confident in our security of supply.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 4 hours ago

That’s weaseling.

They have access to diverse supply. The reserves in hand are a different topic.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Those are not mutually exclusive statements. One talks about gas reserves actually stored right now. If all gas supply gets cut off UK will run out of gas in 2 days. If gas supply drops they only have these reserves to help them offset this while they look for new sources.

The spokesperson says they have access to more supplies. This can mean they have ships and pipelines delivering them more gas all the time and that they have those supplies secured for more than two days. He says that sources this gas are diverse and that they are not worried about this being disrupted.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Maximum capacity is 12 days of gas

Gas is hard to store so reserves are small. Times like this with price increases is exactly when you lower reserves to create temporary supply to depress price inflation. When prices are better, or as winter approaches, you fill the reserves back up.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Isn't it more that the national gas storage was sold off/ privatised, and the private operators decided it's more profitable to have less storage?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

UK doing UK things.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Sure glad we let the Nimby's dictate infrastructure

[–] Exeous@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (4 children)
[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 2 points 7 minutes ago

People who oppose building anything.

It's a US term vastly abused by YIMBY/Developer simps who want a libertarian approach to house construction, to cover everyone from environmentalist who don't want giant AI datacenters built nextdoor to them to people who think a % of newly built homes should be affordable.

Yeah TrueNIMBYs™ exist but the vast majority of "NIMBYs" are people with legitimate concerns that could be addressed if developers made slightly less money on their project.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I think it’s the acronym for “not in my backyard”.

Basically residents that oppose things that are needed for the community, like certain infrastructure, because it affects their property values or changes their neighborhood but aren’t opposed to it elsewhere.

[–] Exeous@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago
[–] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Acronym for Not In My Back Yard

[–] Exeous@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago
[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

nimby = Not in my backyard

He’s talking about people who oppose all change, especially new wind and solar power installations.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't say "especially" renewable electricity. The magnitude of that NIMBYism pales in comparison to opposing zoning dense enough to support walking, biking and transit (which is the far bigger contributor to "petroleum supplies cut off" being a problem).

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago* (last edited 12 minutes ago)

The UK doesn't use US style zoning though.

And zoning on both sides of the Atlantic has very little to do with the under supply of housing.

The reality is private markets are really bad at building affordable homes, as It's more profitable to build few homes and what does get built is built to rent out, with a hefty chunk of those rents used to inflate house prices further.