this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
147 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

82363 readers
3552 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 25 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Anecdotally, workers report a bigger increase in burnout because the increased pressure for more productivity and AI usually talking the more creative parts of the job thus leaving the boring verification and fact checking work to the worker.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I told the owner of the company recently that, and I quote, "I will fucking kill myself if my job becomes reviewing AI output"

[–] BennyTheExplorer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What did he say, do you still have your job?

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

lol yeah, I am in a position where I can say stuff like that. also he generally tends to listen as long as people actually have a point. but he is super pro AI.

he didn't really have a response to it. he doesn't seem to get that not everything needs to be AI. he thinks it will enable people to do more better work, and kind of seems to ignore the possibility that not everybody will get to use it like he does - some people will have to validate the output. he seems to think that it will get to the point where people don't need to validate the output, it will be like entering numbers into a calculator and the result is trusted (or, at least certified good enough).

[–] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 27 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That’s where a vicious cycle can form: increased capability leads to increased output, which leads to higher expectations, which then pressures further expansion

Same as The Digitalization promised. Instead of reducing work we receive and send even more emails, chats, and notifications.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 hours ago

Same principle as "your spending will increase to match your income".

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 28 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

To the surprise of absolutely nobody

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 6 points 11 hours ago

Capitalism gonna capitalize

[–] 7112@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Eggyhead@lemmings.world 7 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

My goodness! How did you upscale that image so beautifully??

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

You might hate it, it is probably AI.

[–] itsmistermoon@piefed.social 3 points 8 hours ago

It totally looks more like a simplified vector trace of the original image, vectors are infinitely scalable until you export to pixels.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

AI made posting this Pikachu meme take more work!

[–] 7112@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Random internet search.

Here's the source

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 10 hours ago

Yea it needs moar jpeg

[–] moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub 17 points 13 hours ago

“…Employees worked at a faster pace, took on a broader scope of tasks, and extended work into more hours of the day, often without being asked to do so,” Ye and Ranganathan wrote of their in-progress research.

Every boss: $$$$$$$$

[–] irate944@piefed.social 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

In their observations and interviews with employees of the 200-person company, the researchers found that generative AI didn’t free up time—it expanded what workers felt capable of, and willing, to take on.

The title is either poorly thought out, or bait lol

TL;DR: the study says that AI doesn’t save time, but it intensifies work because the people using it feel more confident in tackling more things (that’s my interpretation after skimming it)

[–] errer@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Right now everything the study finds seems to be a positive for both workers and bosses…workers are motivated and more cognitively engaged, bosses are getting more work out of them.

The second part is purely speculation on how this might lead to unwanted side effects in the future, but the study offers no evidence at all for those effects yet.

How is it a positive for you to be required to deliver 10x the work in the same timeframe as before, while earning the same salary, and while having your job change without warning or negotiation? AI makes it possible to do much more work in a shorter amount of time, but that doesn't translate into more free time - it's just that it becomes expected that you should deliver much more work.

Let me give you an example: imagine you work for a magazine. Before, you worked on a team of 5 designers, who each had a week to come up with two or three sections of the magazine. Now, most of the team is gone, you are creating the whole magazine by yourself using AI, your job changed from writing copy and using photoshop to create art to "prompt engineering". The company expanded its business and now they publish 10 magazines (mostly AI slop) instead of one, because they can.

This is great for those who sell tokens and maybe for your boss, no one else. Workers end up being expected to increase their output multiple times; the fun parts of the job are taken over by AI and you're left doing basically QA all day; the market is runover by AI slop; your boss now has to compete not only with very specialized people, but also with kids using AI.

I can tell you from personal experience working in the consulting world that many people who have been heavy AI users for the last year are now ending up with burnout. I can personally see everything the article mentions going on in my real world bubble.