this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
121 points (96.9% liked)

Warhammer 40k

5431 readers
224 users here now

A community dedicated to the universe of Warhammer 40k, a tabletop setting in the far, distant future.

This is a general community for 40k miniatures, art, lore discussion, and gameplay discussion.

Rules

  1. Keep it civil. Don’t insult other community members in posts or comments, and don’t make posts designed to insult other community members or parts of the fandom with different opinions.

  2. Posts must be on-topic.

  3. No real life politics. That means no political advocacy, and no real life political discussions vaguely dressed up as on-topic posts. If you want to discuss real life politics, you are free to start your own community.

  4. No memes/low-effort spam/Youtube poops style posts. grimdank is a place for those.

  5. Posts must be coherent.

  6. If a post is otherwise allowed but has realistic gore or nudity, please mark it NSFW.

Helpful Links

Related 40K Communities:

!grimdank@lemmy.world

!oldhammer@lemmy.world

!warhammer30k@lemmy.world

!killteam@sh.itjust.works

!imaginarywarhammer@lemmy.world

Other tabletop hobby communities:

!tabletopminis@lemmy.world

!battletech@lemmy.world

!swlegion@lemmy.world

!coldwarwargaming@lemmy.world

!wargaming@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
121
RTFC! (feddit.org)
submitted 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) by NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org to c/warhammer40k@lemmy.world
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

I hope Cavill’s a decent dude IRL, he seems like a cool dude when it comes to nerding out on his roles.

[–] Fluke@feddit.uk 4 points 7 hours ago

He should be playing Ciaphas Cain in some "Blackadder goes Imperial Guardsman" flashback recounting of his life. Even cherry picking just the ripest stories would get a few potentially great movies by my estimation.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 49 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

After the fallout with him and Netflix, I'm glad to see that he's able to flex his nerd knowledge again.

[–] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 8 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

He's a passionate nerd with a deep love for his people, and he fought the corpos on the canon he knew better than they did.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 31 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

He left the Witcher franchise for similar reasons - they couldn’t keep to canon.

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't the writers just ignore the source material and thought they could write better? Which made them effectively write fan fiction. And even by those standards, bad fan fiction.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

1:30 seconds into episode 1 season 3 Geralt is openly attacking humans. Now I'm sure there's bullshit that explains it but that's as far as I made it because fuck Netflix.

[–] cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

there is a reason why he was called the butcher of blaviken

he didnt sell meat

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Provocation. This was not that.

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Not only couldn't they keep to cannon, they butchered it horribly. The Witcher is set in a world of rich lore and history, almost none of which is explored or explained in that shitful show. The first season is basically the first book put in a blender and strained through a sieve, and the second season, as far as I can tell, is a load of crap. I gave up after that.

I haven't read any of the books and barely played the games, so I don't know much about the world. I did enjoy the first season, less so the second, and didn't make it far into season 3

[–] Rainbowblite@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago

He was perfect for the role too. If they stuck to the story, it would have been an amazing series.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 27 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

While he was a walking encyclopedia of Witcher lore, wanting to give fans the best representation/adaption of the source material that could be made.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 hours ago

And they were Netflix.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 hours ago

Least annoying Warhammer fan:

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 25 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

How is this not literally in the contract when working with q specific IP?

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago

I'm surprised it's not a thing for this. Games Workshop is generally pretty protective of their IP. They license it out like crazy, but generally in pretty restricted bits unless you prove some level of respect.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 28 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

“We want to broaden the appeal to bring more people into the universe so when we make more content tangentially related to the IP more people watch them.”

It’s step 2 of the enshittification steps for media companies. Step 3 is blaming the fans when they say they don’t like the new stuff because it’s totally different from what they loved.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

Games Workshop is really good at doing 2 and 3, they destroyed an entire setting and profuct line doing it.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The people who pay to use the IP put up so much money that it has to be crowd sourced among a few rich people/orgs. The money doesn't care about the property, only the opportunity to leverage this into more money. They are paying for an opportunity.

With this opportunity they make a product that uses the nouns of the source material with varying levels of concern for the output. Not all money is the same and some care about the deliverable more than others. Compare Sony comic book movies to Disney and you can see what having a big comics nerd like Feige can do to keep it true to the material while keeping the content new.

Netflix didn't care about what fans consider truth. They wanted content for their catalogue. Most makers of media don't care about what they make as long as it's popular and any lawsuits don't drain the gains.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

Seeking a mythical "wider, modern audience" rather than appealing to the core fans.

It is an excellent strategy to alienate everyone and thank an IPs value, to be used as a tax write-off.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

How so? The original lore is a mess and several details have changed over years while novelists have contradicted each other multiple times.

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The sincere effort I think is what's most important. Even if the show contradicts some of the existing lore one can still make a good faith argument as to why something is added or left out due to other reasons in-universe and out

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah sure. If they wrote "Henry Cavill's rule ensures a lore-faithful adaptation" - fine, that would be great. "100% Lore Accurate" is an impossible standard that just ensures many an immature nerd will load their keyboard with religious intent.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Maybe the show will be just as convoluted and contradictory so it's 100% accurate. 🤷‍♂️

[–] Flying_Penguin@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago

I would be okay with that. Really lets the viewer get a sense of the effects of Chaos. /s

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Just imagining a Space Marine Chaplain slamming a Crozius onto a keyboard screaming about heretics lol

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 10 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Never underestimate a writers ability to fuck shit up. One easy example is the Halo tv show.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago

The writers were forced into using Halo for that show. They wanted to do their own thing and the producers made them use the license.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 5 points 9 hours ago

Are you saying that Master Cheeks wouldn't have had sex with a POW?

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

He's one of the greatest actors of his generation IMHO.

And apparently a strong personal set of ethics from at least what I've read about him in the media.

[–] Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Except for his views on consent

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago

I feel like you should really provide a source if youre going to say things like that

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Which edition of the Codex? 3e is the farthest I'll go.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If you're asking that question you probably have already read at least 1 I assume

Yes, Codex: Craftworld Eldar.