this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
95 points (99.0% liked)

politics

28770 readers
2388 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump’s massive East Wing ballroom project is poised to get its final approval from a government commission that oversees planning for federal buildings and land in the nation’s capital, despite receiving over 32,000 comments from the public overwhelmingly opposing the construction.

The National Capital Planning Commission is expected to take a final vote to approve plans for the ballroom on Thursday, marking the latest clearance for the project in a process that has been on a fast track since Trump suddenly demolished the East Wing last October.

Some 9,000 pages of public comments to the NCPC released ahead of the meeting detailed major objections from Americans who expressed concerns about the project’s size and scope, cost and destruction of history, among other complaints.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 28 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Is this about the Epstein ballroom?

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 14 points 16 hours ago

The one they're building on top of a ~~skynet~~ stargate data center yes. It's a giant dogshit AI cluster for Oracle to run Grok in.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 21 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

Some democrat should run for president on the platform that they will completely dismantle this thing starting on day one. As trivial as that would be relative to the shitshow that is this country’s overall status, I believe it would meaningfully move support. Of course, no democrat will ever do that because they are more concerned with appearing decorous than winning or ever accomplishing anything.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 13 hours ago

It would be a powerful symbolic gesture of healing. anyone who isn't willing to do this is too weak to be the candidate America needs to heal.

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If there's ever a new admin they'll need to anyway. Guaranteed that thing is riddled with listening/tracking devices.

[–] mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago

Honestly damn thing probably isn't even built to code.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Dismantling it would be a further waste of money. The best thing they could do is rename it the Barrack Hussein Obama Ballroom.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

It would be worth the loss of money to deter future presidential vanity projects.

If Trump's still alive to see the ballroom finished, hopefully he's still alive to see it knocked down.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Rebuild the Whitehouse and make Trump pay for it

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

I would love to see that being a prominent part of the platform. Along with many more kitchen table issues, yes, but I hate it when Democrats are such pussies about stuff like this.

[–] bluegreenpurplepink@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Let's not waste even more money tearing it down, just show the public the bunker underneath, maybe open it up to tourists, and get some decent designers to zhuzh up the ballroom after we've used it for the tribunals for this entire administration and their collaborators.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Repossess trump's assets and sell them off to cover the cost of restoring the Whitehouse.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world -4 points 16 hours ago

This is really dumb.

[–] SkavarSharraddas@gehirneimer.de 6 points 15 hours ago

The soullessness of pedo-fascism.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

Ngl that looks like shit.

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 3 points 16 hours ago

‘Soulless hotel conference space’: Trump’s Jeffrey Epstein Memorial ballroom is poised for approval despite scathing public feedback

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Who knew something associated with Epstein would be soulless?

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago

I wonder if they took any influences from nazi architecture.