Just keep her in hearings 24/7. Less harm to the American people
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
104 points (99.1% liked)
The Trump-Epstein Files™
1056 readers
470 users here now
We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.
Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post
Our Rules
(Subject to Change)
- #1 Be kind: keep it civil and amicable. The enemy is not in this community but in Palaces, The White House and penthouses.
- #2 Trigger Warnings: required. Mark posts which may be triggering to read or see for victims of sexual abuse with "[TW]" in front of your post title. If you're posting an image or video with explicit thumbnail, you will have to set the entire post as NSFW AND include the TW.
- #3 Cite sources: preferably direct link to the article/pdf and or an archive link in case there is a paywalled. In the article find a relevant few paragraphs and quote them in your post.
- #4 Post the Bates numbers: when referencing evidence (even if it is mentioned in an article), please post
- the Bates number of the file you’re referring to (EFTA00000000)
- a link to the original source
- a link to a mirror of the file in case DOJ pulls the file.
- #5 include key paragraphs: when posting articles, include a few key paragraphs of the article (not the entire article)
- #6 avoid links to social media as sources. Links to twitter must use xcancel.com.
Our Justice System
- First offence: warning + 2 day ban
- Second offence: 7 day ban
- Third offence: permanent ban from community
- Creating multiple accounts to interact with this community: permanent ban for all accounts in community + report to your instance admin.
This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
What a fantastic idea.
Ooooooook. Here's how I think this will play out.
She'll stand trial. Tons of evidence will be presented for how she's guilty. But then the courts will realize they can't convict trumps right hand, and basically call it a whoopsie.
Back around 2013 there was a police chase here in Cleveland Ohio. I'm going to present this to you how the media portrayed it at the time. You let me know where you figured out what really happened.
Ok, so the chase starts in front of the city courthouse. A man and woman got into their car. The man, who was the driver pulled out a gun, pointed it a cop across the street, and fired 1 bullet at the cops, and then sped off.
This created a police chase. Soon 10 police cars were chasing them. Police from neighboring districts, which even though they're still Cleveland police, usually act independant of each other. However they were called in to assist the chase which went on for nearly 2 hours.
The chase ended in an elementary school parking lot, where 137 shots were fired by 23 different police officers from 3 districts of Cleveland police. Both suspects were killed in the gun battle.
Did you catch it? Did you spot the bullshit? Well, lets continue.
In the court case that followed, the responding police officers were put on trial for homocide. The evidence showed that no gun was recovered to which police statements claimed they threw it out the window during the chase. It was never recovered. When questioned why they didn't submit dashcam evidence from one of the cop cars always on dash cam, they claimed it happened off camera.
The problem with that claim, is that the cop who was shot at to begin this chase never was farther than 45 feet away from them, and they were in frame the entire chase. At no point can you see them throw out a gun.
In the end, it was revealed there was never a gun. It was the car backfiring, and he didn't speed away, he casually drove off in a normal way. It wasn't until he was being rammed by a cop car, without his lights on, that he sped off.
The judge then agreed the cause of death for both the man and the woman was caused by a bullet fired by the police. The judge then chose NOT to convict a single police officer.
His logic? Well we know a cop killed them. But it's impossible to know which bullet it was that killed them, and which cop fired that bullet.
Each of this couple had over 40 bullets hit their body.
I fully suspect in this trial against Bondi a similiar situation. Where she's guilty, and everyone knows she's guilty, but the court finds a way to call it a oopsie-poopsie.
This is the world we live in.
I'm so fucking angry all the time now. It's just so clear now there never were any rules, you are a sucker if you followed them. I really need somewhere to put all this anger towards these authority figures that have abandoned their oaths and duties they swore to uphold.
Yea was here for that. Guy I went to HS with was on duty that night and joined the chase. Didn't fire any shots but was on scene at the time it happened.
He testified truthfully during the trial, and wouldn't you know he had to throw away a 10+ year career because after that all the other cops hated and harassed him.
During that murder, one of the cops jumped up on the hood off the car after it was stopped and unloaded his entire magazine down straight into the people inside.
Protect and serve my ass. And of course heaven forbid if we ever hold law enforcement accountable.
She’ll stand trial.
I think you lost me there. No charges have been brought, or even suggested. Nor will they be, because Pam Bondi heads the very organization that would bring them: she'd have to be kicked out of the AG role first.
The subpoena is simply for Bondi to be forced to testify under oath for the House Oversight Committee, as opposed to simply showing up. Whether that makes any difference or not is up to whatever personal respect she may still have for the law, and I'm not holding my breath.
But what it does do is create a path of personal legal responsibility for whatever filth tumbles out of her mouth under oath. That's not important today, but could be in whatever future moment in time Congress feels like resuming its own co-equal Article I powers and duties in regard to rogue officials. Not a promise, and definitely not charges. Just a caution with potential future bite.
I feel forced to add that the DOW is under 50,000, lol.
Someone snatch that woman's derision/distraction binder on her way into the hearing, please.
How about instead use black highlighter to mark all content in that binder that's not related to the purpose of the hearing.
I don't know why you're laughing! The Dow is over 50 Thou!
It's crazy to me that it doesn't have at least a million views yet.
Autotune the news is pretty oldschool
Why? All she's doing is PROTECTING the World's most Prolific Pedophile?
Wake me up when anyone is actually held accountable.
So you're just gonna sleep until the US collapses? 😤
Hibernation is a valid survival strategy.
🐻
If we can get 200,000 armed Americans to march together on Maralago and burn it to the ground, I am down.
Alone there is nothing you can do without throwing away your life.
She seems like someone who'd choose perjury
She already has. Many many times.
So she'll go spit bullshit for a day. Then go back to doing Trump's bidding. Nothing will come of this
Eh, maybe. The lockstep of the majority party seems to be breaking up in the manner of a dam breaking. For Bondi to be subpoenaed -- even after Chairman James Comer reminded them she didn't have to be under oath, and they could invite her to do "briefings" at any time instead -- five Republicans joined all the Democrats in subpoenaing Bondi anyway.
Feel free to disagree of course, because what follows is simply my opinion, but often Oversight Committees are formed for the express purpose of suppressing oversight, and that's exactly what this one was created to do: contain congressional curiosity and also restrict the congressional powers that might otherwise be used to actually investigate. "It died in committee" is a saying for a reason.
But that's literally collapsing before our eyes. After I posted that, I read this. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is a Republican from Florida. Watch it on C-SPAN or on her own social media, but this is her three hours ago supporting Rep. Mace's motion today for a subpoena for information on a congressional “sexual harassment slush fund” that's been reported on since at least 2017. Here are her words at the mic in support:
I support Representative Mace’s subpoena here, as well as the amendment to it. And I just think it’s really disgusting how this institution protects itself because y’all just, half of them, voted to send this stuff to House Ethics, where you know it’s gonna die. We know that members of Congress are using taxpayer dollars to pay off sexual harassment. We just had a member of Congress literally sexual harass a woman that then lit herself on fire, and you guys all protected him! You guys all protected him — my own side, your side.
And so, if you guys wanna talk about victims, if you wanna go out and virtue signal, and then you guys are gonna kill her stuff on the floor and then try to pass– yeah, of course we should subpoena all this stuff. But just, I’m not gonna sit here and play games. I think it’s a complete fraud. I think that’s why the American people hate us! I think the midterms are coming up and everyone should go on record for this, and I hope that members are exposed for this. I hope — it goes back, I think, to the ’70s — because it’s wrong that it’s happening. It’s wrong that we cover up for it. It’s wrong that we can’t censure our own side because people are busy making deals, because you guys don’t wanna censure your side. It’s a deal that’s been cut and people hate us for it. So yeah, I support it.
According to what has happened so far, Rep. Luna is supposed to be BOTH speaking and voting as told. That's very apparently no longer the case. Last fall, four broke rank to force EFTA to a vote via discharge petition. Today, five broke rank to subpoena Bondi against Comer's express insistence that they not. And Luna just stood up to speak of that which we do not mention publicly, and just to be absolutely sure it got heard, posted it to her own socials.
It takes a well-controlled majority in the majority party to ensure nothing happens in committee. And that is very clearly gone. Do you think Chairman Comer and the majority can count on Rep. Luna in committee now? I don't.
So while I wouldn't bet on anything happening, I also wouldn't bet against. The machine is breaking up before our eyes, in a drawn out process that is gathering speed. These things are always incredibly slow, until they're not. That's where we are now. Can they patch it in time? Maybe. Maybe not.
I don't think Republican congresscritters are suddenly growing a spine or developing a conscience -- I think they're concerned about the midterms.
The vast, vast majority of voters want the Epstein files fully released and the perpetrators punished. Any congressman whose voting record shows that they're against this happening is going to have a difficult time in the midterm elections. So they're scrambling to do some performative nonsense to show that they're on the 'right side' of this. But nothing of actual substance will come of it if they can help it.
Maybe they try her. Even if convicted, it’s Federal and Cheeto will pardon her, probably same day. Gives the appearance of doing something while risking nothing. Just my opinion.