this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
171 points (99.4% liked)

World News

54421 readers
4758 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration has been in active discussions with Iranian opposition groups and Kurdish leaders in Iraq about providing them with military support, the sources said.

Iranian Kurdish armed groups have thousands of forces operating along the Iraq-Iran border, primarily in Iraq’s Kurdistan region. Several of the groups have released public statements since the beginning of the war hinting at imminent action and urging Iranian military forces to defect. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has been striking Kurdish groups and said on Tuesday that it targeted Kurdish forces with dozens of drones.

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 31 minutes ago

Ok, but can we give the Kurds the lasting support and right to immigrate easily we keep promising them? They've been some of our greatest allies, especially in the region (actual allies unlike Israel), and we keep leaving them out to dry.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Oh look, we like the Kurds again this week

[–] rarsamx@lemmy.ca 1 points 55 minutes ago

Isn't this a remake of an 80's movie starring Osama bin Laden?

[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Just so we can then abandon and turn our backs on them again.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Name one time that's backfired.

[–] gergolippai@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

after the success of contras in nicaragua/colombia, mujahideen in afghanistan, and many other places that don't come to mind right away, we bring you... kurds in iran! i mean trump will definetely not be around to see the long term effects, and maybe hegseth is also dead by the time it peters out, so all fine, right?

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] gergolippai@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Oh yes them too!

[–] Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Kurds are always happy to be used as pawns by the US

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 hours ago

I think they sure were happy not to get slaughtered by ISIS

[–] lithiumground@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

As I Kurds , I agree. Education is too important.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Isn’t this exactly what we did that caused 9/11?

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Some people learn from past actions to make better decisions, but this current administration is against learning.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

Fool me once, shame on... shame on you. Fool me—you can't get fooled again...

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 55 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

CIA has certainly never regretted arming insurgent groups, before...

[–] formergijoe@lemmy.world 45 points 14 hours ago

And the Kurds have never regretted allying themselves with the U.S. before https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgrzd76p4lo

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

sun rises in the east US betrays the Kurds

I don't trust a single word out of the lying imperialists' mouth, and from what I'm hearing, Kurdish leaders about had it as well

[–] how_we_burned@lemmy.zip 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Hey if he is willing to give em weapons, supplies and gear then they should take it all and then sit on their hands.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 9 points 12 hours ago

That would be the funniest shit

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 8 hours ago

Kurds using new weapons to stage terrorist attacks in Turkey in 3... 2...

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 33 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Didnt trump betray the kurds like not that long ago?

[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's on the GOP President's Must-Do list going back to Bush Sr:

  • Cause a financial crisis
  • Start a war in the Middle East
  • Inflame racial tensions
  • Betray the Kurds
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 5 points 9 hours ago

"BuT tEh DeMoCrAtS lEfT uS sUcH a MeSs To cLeAn Up"

(Always referring to whatever fresh hell they were up to the last time they were in the seat)

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Yes. And they will remember that. This is every single time we have interfered with Iran's government all happening again all at once. Expect similar results.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 9 points 12 hours ago

Where have I see this movie before? 

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 31 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (4 children)

Personal opinion: this news is likely true. I will not tell anyone if this is good or bad news, as it could be both.

Most likely, the CIA has been repeating to Trump and Pentagon like a broken grammophone: "you cannot win by aerial bombardment alone". It seems that now the CIA got authorization to make promises to Kurds, and have delivered weapons. Kurds however, most likely:

  • remember being double-crossed in January (Turkey alerted Iran of their expedition)
  • remember being double-crossed in December (US allowed HTS, now called "Syrian government" to surprise them)
  • remember being double-crossed many times before

They are likely reluctant. According to the sources, they have asked for air support. The source cannot tell if support has been granted. US and Israeli strikes have certainly been above-average intense in Western Iran. An effective ground front might be the amount of pressure it would take to overwhelm Iran. Or maybe not.

Judging by the most recent speech by Reza Pahlavi, where he addresses all ethnic minorities and regional tribes and promises extensive safeguards to their identity and culture if a new Iran should form, I would estimate that a rift exists between Pahlavi's faction (they want an intact but democratic Iran) and the Kurdish factions (50 million Kurds are waiting for an opportunity to set up Kurdistan, 10 million of them live in Iran - this could be a condensation nucleus that starts the formation of a country). Reza Pahlavi obviously cannot promise them that, so he's willing to promise everything else.

As a note: Kurds will not declare statehood quickly at all - they know they must keep a low profile. They know Turkey will attack them if they declare statehood, Iraq will likely attack them, Syria has recently attacked them for mere ambitions of autonomy. They won't declare anything, but may try to carve out a highly autonomous province and see what happens in practise.

However, they will fear being betrayed again for the umpteenth time, which may reduce their eagerness to stick their heads into fire.

And it won't help the US break open the Hormuz strait, because there are no Kurds living there. They live in the western mountains. If Trump wants Hormuz, US soldiers will have to set their own feet on ground.

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

There are two things that get brought up in this topic

The Kurds being betrayed: well there's of course the situation where during the Syrian civil war they were coming under attack from islamist forces, not in the least ISIS, known for killing all the men and boys and raping and enslaving all the women and girls.

So do you think they have a lot of remorse that they accepted weapons, intel and air support during that time?

Of course they hoped to gain backing for their own state and the US leaving them to fend for themselves could feel like betrayal, but you'd have to weigh in the alternative to the initial 'deal' they got.

Wrt Iran: it's funny that a lot of Lemmings seem to agree that the regime of Iran is horrendous. However, when the question is raised on how the Irani people can topple their dictatorship when they don't possess any weapons, they just shrug (or start about Israel lol). And then when the first realistic opportunity pops up where the Iranian people could get weapons and could fight the regime themselves, ... Well you can see the responses in your topic lol

[–] lithiumground@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

condensation

As I kurds, I think kurdistan will just benefit and serve to ISrael and USA not kurds. As wise kurd , should know that it will bring more chaos with hand of USA+Israel. Kurds should understand Greater Israel project!

Education is important.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Excellent summary. The US has used and abused the Kurds over and over again. While they'd be crazy to not take their opportunity to establish some territorial autonomy, they'd have to be utter fools to trust the US not to stab them in the back again.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

How our government has treated and backstabbed the Kurds in the last decade or so is an absolute travesty.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

in the last decade or so

"or so" is lifting a lot there, like a couple more decades.

Not that I'm disagreeing with you; rather, a "yes, but also". heh. :/

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 8 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

“you cannot win by aerial bombardment alone”

Win what?

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

The peace prize ofcourse.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Netanyahu's approval? Doesn't seem like there's any plan besides that. No goals, no exit strategy, no exercises in democracy, just

1 kill all the leaders 2 ????? 3 Profit.

[–] hobovision@mander.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago

I imagine they think winning means installing a puppet government. That government being successful? Well that's the next guy's problem...

If you can't destabilise them one way, change your strategy and try again! 😞

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Headline should read, " Stand by for future wave of ISIS and Taliban".

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago

The Kurds have never been part of ISIS or the Taliban.

No, the Kurds are the ethnicity that always sides with the US, and then the US abandons them.

Been happening since at least the 1920s.

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

We make all the bad guys! Then blame them and use them!

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Look if they have such terrible judgement when it comes to allies, isn't this really their fault?

[–] canadian_commie@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

This can only end well….. right?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Who had Kurds on their 2026 bingo card?

[–] paranoid@lemmy.world -1 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Isn't this how we got 9/11?

[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Not at all? Bin Laden was furious at Middle Eastern countries cooperating with hosting the US military and generally being friendly to the West.

If you're talking about the ties to Mujahideen, Afghanistan was just a friendly host country since Bin Laden was seen as a problem by the Saudi royal family.

That was different because it was a few years ago.

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 2 points 13 hours ago

It’s how we got Rambo III.