this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
7 points (61.3% liked)

Asklemmy

53382 readers
584 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Been thinking about the voting system lately and how it inevitably kills in-depth discussion in growing communities.

Every sub/community follows the same trajectory: starts small with passionate users sharing quality content/discussion β†’ grows in popularity β†’ memes and low-effort posts flood in β†’ actual discussion gets buried or downvoted.

I'm guilty of this too tbh. I realized I use upvotes/downvotes as personal "like/dislike" buttons rather than judging relevance to the community.

Here's my hot take:

  1. Voting should be restricted to subscribed users only
  2. Downvotes should be capped at a fraction of total upvotes a user gives out

The clearest example of this failure is gonewild. The demographics mean male content (which is 100% allowed) gets mass-downvoted into oblivion while female content dominates the front page. It's not about quality or relevance anymore - it's just a popularity contest.

Anyone else feel like the voting system needs a complete rethink?

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LemmySlopSkimmer@hexbear.net 11 points 3 days ago

probably the piefed social credit score killing those communities tbh

[–] lemming@anarchist.nexus 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I just block meme-posters and meme communities and my Fediverse stays interesting as a result. No need to convince/wait for the world to change when I can conveniently block the slop myself, it's one of the most appreciated features of PieFed/Lemmy imho.
Recall that whole db0 defederation of feddit.org? Was not a problem for me at all because I had already blocked the instance long before the whole thing kicked off simply because I didn't speak German and didn't want my feed full of German posts I couldn't understand anyway.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

you can just untick "german" in your language settings...

[–] lemming@anarchist.nexus 2 points 3 days ago

Only English is ticked... Don't worry mate, I already solved the problem!

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Lemmynsfw solved this by disabling downvotes. I don't think memes were a problem there.

An alternative is strong moderation to keep off-topic comments and posts out.

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My instance disables downvotes and it's much better.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

I really think removing downvotes or requiring the downvoter to explain the downvote would make communities better.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Is there any way to stop the mods from going mad with power?

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Isn't the situation in gonewild a clear sign it'd be wise to set up two separate communities? gonewildgals and gonewildguys or something? If a community is "too broad", niche content will always lose out. The answer is usually setting up a new community specific to that niche.

Fighting low-effort posts and memes either means setting up a meme community, more moderation on the posts or both.

[–] MindfulMaverick@piefed.zip 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

People could discuss pretty much anything in old school forums which had only a handful of boards. Now we need millions of communities just because Reddit has them as well, even if there isn't enough activity to justify them. I feel like the Fediverse already has enough fragmentation issues as it is because of all the similar communities in different instances. Separating niche communities into even more niche ones when those communities are barely active to begin with just doesn't make sense. At some point we have to ask if the problem is the content or the voting system itself.

I like that on hexbear and some other communities here you have just an upvote and no downvote. It makes posters who disagree have to either just move on or actually make a decent argument instead of just pressing the β€œI don’t like this” button.