this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
27 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

8530 readers
19 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump is tedious to listen to for 30 seconds, so signing up for nearly two hours of his worst hits didn't seem a good use of time.

I seriously have no idea who the audience was for that.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rozwud@beehaw.org 1 points 7 hours ago

I was content to read the tldw, and honestly, if no one had been up to the task of watching, I would have shrugged and been grateful.

Here's my state of the union address:

Shits fucked and reactionary ideology is killing us all, we either end the capitalists or they will end us.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

It’s very important for a cult leader to make long rambling speeches. Jim Jones would deliver lengthy sermons to his followers multiple times a day, often playing up his successes and lambasting enemies both real and imagined. For the follower listening is an act of supplication and the actual content of the speech is irrelevant - what matters to the cult dynamic is that the leader’s voice is heard.

[–] taldennz@lemmy.nz 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why would you watch it, when you can get an itemised list of the lies later anyway.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought when it was on that they’d need a transcription bot to live-update that wikipedia page that catalogues all his lies, as no human could possibly keep up.

[–] taldennz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 day ago

I thought the pre-election debate was bad enough for that... but it made no difference to the result (at least not in the right direction).

This is possibly the first US President where lies-per-minute might be a useful metric.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Quexotic@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So, this is a good use for AI if I ever heard of one. One of the few things that actually does competently and somewhat usefully is summarized text and pull out themes. So I took the entire transcript, dumped it into AI, and asked what the racist dog whistles were in the speech, and it told me. So it's great because I don't have to darken my mind with that bullshit, but I get the information to kind of see what he's up to.

[–] spit_evil_olive_tips@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So I took the entire transcript, dumped it into AI, and asked what the racist dog whistles were in the speech, and it told me.

right...and then you read the transcript yourself and/or watched the video, to confirm that the summary it gave you was accurate, right?

...right?

because if Trump used 9 racist dogwhistles in his speech, and the "AI" summary gave you a list of 10, and one of them was hallucinated, how would you know?

you're using the "AI" as a confirmation bias machine. you expect there to be dogwhistles, so you ask it for dogwhistles, and it tells you, "yup, here's the dogwhistles".

try this. pretend you're a MAGA true believer, take that exact same transcript, and ask the "AI" for a list of ways that the speech demonstrates Trump's commitment to America First. or for ways that Trump is making America safer, or improving the economy, or whatever.

no matter what you ask it, it's just going to fill in the blanks of what it thinks you want to hear.

humans are really good at confirmation bias, as it turns out. you don't need to outsource it to a warehouse full of GPUs. you can just do it with your boring old analog brain.

I get the information to kind of see what he’s up to.

your news diet is full of empty calories. you read that "AI" summary and you feel like you're better informed. but you're not.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

With all due respect, if you need further info to see what he's into ...

[–] Quexotic@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't, I just want to see what he's up to at the moment.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It'll be irrelevant after the next squirrel he sees.

[–] Quexotic@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Thank you, dude. I definitely needed that laugh!

...or after the next gish that he gallops, to further your point.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Hell no. I'd rather watch paint dry or flies fuck.

[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

I watched flies fuck on channel 11

  • alkaline trio
[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 11 points 2 days ago

I mean, if Sir David Attenborough is narrating the flies fucking, that's gripping television, as opposed to whatever the fuck that was last night.

[–] remington@beehaw.org 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I haven't heard a word out of his mouth for over a year and I'm keeping it that way.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago

Easy enough when you've got acreage in Maine!

[–] irvinefantasyno@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago

I did something much more productive, like snuggle and nap.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

My parents turned it on towards the end for a brief few seconds before tuning into something else. That was over the immediate lies he told I'm those dew seconds.

[–] Ryoae@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

I really almost forget what he sounds like because I've made it a mission to watch as little of video content where he's on it and what audio clips of him is played. The only times I ended up hearing him was because IPR, a local radio station, would play up things he's said in the news reports.

Other than articles written of him, I don't really watch or listen to anything of that thing.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

Nah. I just did not feel like drinking last night.