this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
55 points (100.0% liked)

news

24631 readers
605 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.is/QfphH

Workers have been falling behind dramatically in the tug of war between capital and labor, stoking serious concern about the trust holding the economy and society together.

What trust?

Diane Swonk, chief economist and managing director at KPMG, highlighted troubling data on corporate versus workers’ earnings that were included in a report she recently authored.

Western economist finally figures out the obvious, shocks the rest of the financial elite, more at 11.

It showed corporate profits as a share of U.S. GDP have soared to 15.85% from 8% in 1982. By contrast, employee compensation as a share of GDP has tumbled to 61.9% from 66.6% in 1982.

While labor’s slice of the economy has previously been lower than it is today, the overall trend line has pointed down, and the gap compared with corporate earnings is now at a post–World War II record high.

That record high was when the profits to pay was inverted, as in people were actually being paid well under the post-war social-democratic system to the point corporation profit margins were slim as oil on a
dipstick. Obviously Capital really didn't like that.

“This chart from my recent Economic Compass still haunts me,” Swonk said in a social media post last week. “A friend refers to it as the ‘revolution chart,’ which [is] disturbing but telling. Inequality fuels social and economic instability.”

Don't believe for a second all the priests of Capital that is the neo-liberal economist are all high off their own hogs. There are enough among them who actually know capitalist economics to analyze and comprehend the critical flaws of capitalism leading to its own ruptures

She added the divergence helps explain how the economy looks on paper versus how it’s experienced by most Americans.

What I said above. They're not all tools.

Indeed, while aggregate data show cooler inflation, steady income gains, and resilient consumer spending, the details reveal a sharp divide. For example, the richest 20% of households account for nearly all U.S. spending growth since the pandemic, while the bottom 80% have merely kept up with inflation.

Today, Americans grapple with an affordability crisis that has stretched across a range of basic expenses, including food, electricity, insurance, health care, childcare, and housing.

Observe carefully the key wording used, the acknowledgment that "food, electricity, insurance, health care, childcare, and housing." are all basic, as in first line, expenses. That the overwhelming majority of Americans are walking a razors edge from financial ruin. That the economic numbers being put out by the lying capitalist press are only representing the 20% of financially stable Americans with surplus wealth - and of course not counting all the bullshit moneybag passes that are done to artificially create the image of financial growth - and reality is growing starker and darker by the day for the working class. The enemy is aware.

“It gets to the multi-decade erosion in trust—there is an undercurrent of betrayal,” Swonk warned. “Something in our economic narrative is broken.”

In her report, she explained this loss of trust extends globally and across multiple decades, but especially in developing economies over the past year.

At the same time, the generative AI revolution and President Donald Trump’s tariffs have stirred more economic anxiety about job safety.

“CEOs are citing AI as a reason for hiring freezes and layoffs, before the productivity associated with AI is realized,” Swonk wrote. “That could prove penny-wise and pound-foolish; it stokes public backlash to AI, which is intensifying.”

To be sure, there are still some tailwinds that should benefit workers and the overall economy. Trump’s tax cuts will deliver a temporary lift; the World Cup will help ease a tourism downturn; inflation will continue to gradually cool; and massive AI capital expenditures will keep propping up GDP growth.

On the other hand, investors are nervous; uncertainty still hangs over the direction of economic policy; and the housing market remains in the doldrums, she said.

“The result is an economy that appears resilient but feels increasingly fragile,” Swonk concluded. “Growth has held up, yet the connective tissue that supports labor markets, investment, and global cooperation is fraying. Workers are more anxious, investors more herdlike, and markets … more vulnerable to shocks than headlines suggest.”

Her warnings echo what Nobel Prize–winning economist Daron Acemoglu has been saying for years about the origins of economic and political decay.

In a recent interview with Fortune’s Jake Angelo, he said the U.S. is headed for a grim future and outlined two shifts relative to AI development he sees as critical to avoiding deeper decline: cracking down on economic inequality and tempering job destruction.

“If we go down this path of destroying jobs [and] creating more inequality, U.S. democracy is not going to survive,” Acemoglu said.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 8 points 12 hours ago

This is unironically what radicalized me. Seeing the 50-year trend in the "wage-productivity gap" some 9 years ago, showing it to a commie buddy, and he telling me "that's euphemism for surplus value".

[–] cornishon@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 15 hours ago

Holy shit that chart is such a clear indication that the workers of the imperial core have the Soviet Union to thank for their relatively better than now historical standing. But they've been trained to celebrate its overthrow instead.

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 18 points 20 hours ago

I'm starting to think that this whole capitalism thing might just be an elaborate scheme to extract as much value from workers as possible. Someone should write a book about that.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 16 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

U.S. democracy is not going to survive

does-he-know

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 10 points 18 hours ago

Gee, I wonder if there's some important theories explaining why this is happening...?

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Its not an undercurrent. Its the whole damn ocean at this point and we're drowning in it.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 12 points 21 hours ago

the 20% are noticing the undercurrent lmao