this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
11 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

11399 readers
58 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For the better part of a decade, conservative politicians—and Texas politicians in particular—have been absolutely apoplectic about the state of free speech on college campuses. You’ve heard the greatest hits: students are coddled snowflakes who can’t handle the real world, trigger warnings are destroying intellectual rigor, safe spaces are turning universities into daycare centers, and the real threat to America is that professors might have opinions that lean left.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott was so concerned about this supposed crisis that he signed a campus free speech bill in 2019. The whole thing was framed as a brave stand for open inquiry and the marketplace of ideas. As state Senator Joan Huffman said at the time:

“Our college students, our future leaders, they should be exposed to all ideas, I don’t care how liberal they are or how conservative they are.”

What a beautiful sentiment. Truly inspiring stuff.

So naturally, the University of Texas System’s Board of Regents just voted unanimously to ensure students can graduate without being exposed to ideas that might make someone uncomfortable.

The University of Texas System’s Board of Regents unanimously approved Thursday a rule requiring its universities to ensure students can graduate without studying “unnecessary controversial subjects,” despite warnings it could leave them less prepared for the real world.

The rule also requires faculty to disclose in their syllabi the topics they plan to cover and adhere to the plan, and says that when courses include controversial issues, instructors must ensure a “broad and balanced approach” to the discussion.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

There are times I almost feel sorry for conservatives.

Many of them genuinely don't know any better. They're crippled by stupidity, ignorance and/or neurosis and can't see that their views are irrational at best, and they're frightened and intimidated and thus angered by conflicting views, and further crippled by cognitive dissonance. And they can't even consider the possibility that their views aren't generally promoted in higher education simply because they're irrational, so they instead want to ascribe it to censorship. And that seems likely to them because they themselves are frightened by opposing views and demand their censorship, and they just project that weakness onto others.

It's an ugly little trap that inevitably just leads to them becoming more and more frightened and angry and willfully ignorant, and means that they're going to grow old and die still locked in that ugly, hateful, frightened trap of their own making.

But I only almost feel sorry for them, because I always come back to the fact that they're fucking assholes who are actively destroying everything of any actual value that humanity might accomplish.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

That fits well with them ending tenure, a mechanism specifically there to protect discourse the government might not like