this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
462 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

30230 readers
1782 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. 🇬🇧 Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. 🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇸
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] statelesz@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 hours ago

    I had Manjaro break more often in the year I've used it that Arch in the past 5..

    [–] Hupf@feddit.org 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

    Oh no, first lemmynsfw.com and now this

    [–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

    wait what happened to lemmynsfw

    [–] anas@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago

    it’s no more more

    [–] lime@feddit.nu 5 points 3 hours ago

    the only admin disappeared and the bills stopped getting paid, apparently

    [–] Hupf@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

    I wouldn't know, never visited the place 🤐

    [–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

    Why don’t people just use Arch directly instead of using derivatives? Well… I can understand using something like CachyOS as it has a different kernel with optimisations but Manjaro feels very irrelevant. If you just want Arch Linux with simple installation, just use the archinstall script. Regardless of which derivative you use, Arch based distros are going to be heavy maintenance than something like Bazzite, Mint or Ubuntu.

    [–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

    I used Manjaro for a few years before switching to Arch. Manjaro finds a nice sweespot for "Arch but also nice". Furthermore, Arch has gotten much more user friendly in the last 5 years or so. Back in late 2010s, Manjaro was adding a lot of value on top of Arch.

    What really bothered me about Manjaro was the "forum cops" they employ, who are super aggressive to newcomers and unhelpful. It was not a nice experience to seek help. Say what you will about Arch people, they are at least helpful.

    I finally switched to Arch when I got my new machine. I recommend the same.

    [–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

    My thinking process years ago was:

    I had Debian and was not satisfied with the fact that I had to wait ages for updates of stuff like KDE Plasma. I wanted something with shorter update intervals.

    I decided against Ubuntu because of the company behind it.

    I decided against Mint, because it's on level 3 in the derivate tree, so more places where something can go wrong.

    Then I found Manjaro and liked it from the beginning. Very easy to install (no script necessary), awesome custom Plasma theme, short update intervals, ...

    Arch can be scary. I wanted a reliable, easy OS for private use and I knew, I get that with Manjaro. With Arch, I was not sure whether I might FCK something up.

    [–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    from what ive heard of manjaro, they do less testing on new packages than arch. also, nothing on arch ever broke my pc except for the clock, which was probably because i configured it wrong (didn't use archinstall).

    only time an update has ever done anything bad was like a week ago when plasma 6.6 launched and the login freezed the pc, but that was on cachyos, not main arch.

    [–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 1 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago)

    I think, I haven't had any mentionable problem with Manjaro over multiple years.

    [–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

    Arch derivatives that don’t do anything to the core packages or the root system seem very pointless to me. Because you can setup Vanilla Arch to be exactly like that derivative if you wanted to since Arch being a DIY distro. Arch based derivatives create unnecessary fragmentation in already fragmented Linux world. Arch itself is targeted for intermediate to advanced users to build a system from base.

    It makes sense to make derivatives from Debian or Fedora because they have a lot of stuff packed in them for them to be user friendly and work out-of-the-box experience — then derivatives can add from or reduce from to make a distro designed for a specific use which can take much longer time than if the user did it by themselves since those parent distros are usually targeted for non tech enthusiasts.

    [–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 1 points 57 minutes ago

    Because you can setup Vanilla Arch to be exactly like that derivative

    There's the difference, you don't have to set the derivative up.

    [–] rhubarbe@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

    Manjaro differs from Arch in terms of update cycles. They are not rolling like Arch but adhere to some monthly-ish release cycle. Which i love by the way.

    [–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

    Then why not just update vanilla Arch itself on a monthly basis? Or just use something like Fedora or Bazzite. Using Manjaro kinda defeats the whole purpose of using Arch Linux. It is like getting someone to select your custom PC parts and letting them build your PC. You technically still have a custom PC but is it really?

    [–] rhubarbe@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

    Those cycles are meant for testing a coherent set of versions. If you update Arch on a monthly basis I'm not quite sure you got the same testing. I've been running Manjaro for 8 years now (laptop for business and family stuff) and I can't remember any issue with it. I also have Endeavour and Debian on my desktop (gaming / casual) and server.

    [–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

    Yeah but Manjaro’s stable repo is around 2 weeks behind Arch’s. So basically any package in the AUR that has newer dependencies might not work well with packages from Manjaro’s repository. So basically you leave out Arch’s main feature half-broken. Thus, usually, people recommend to run pacman+flatpak instead of AUR. Vanilla Arch has worked flawlessly for me. Once an update borked my system but it took like 10mins to rollback and restore to a working snapshot with Timeshift. And has been running flawlessly since then.

    Arch is pretty rock stable when you have minimal packages and not the most bleeding edge hardware.

    [–] m3t00@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

    unauthorized end-to-end encryption.

    [–] savvywolf@pawb.social 14 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

    It's still technically automaton if your workflow depends on people poking you when things break.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago

    I wouldn't go that far

    [–] _cnt0@sh.itjust.works 45 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)
    [–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 121 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

    It kind of makes it hard to trust this distro when they fuck up the most basic things so often and frequently.

    [–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 29 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

    Notvjust with thsir web hosting. I've had so many updates break random crap it's not even funny. Recently, a random update I did not approve suddenly had kwallet not working. A core piece of a DE they provide a bundled version for. I had to start kwalletd myself every time I wanted to use it.

    It didn't start that way on the fresh install. I didn't do anything myself except reboot. Then suddenly my scripts that nab from the keystore are failing and asking me for passwords and what a mess.

    That's just a more recent example. I remember having quite a few random issues on update in the past, though the only other one I explicitly remember is the DE suddenly failing to start. Like, at all. Luckily I had a recent timeshift backup saved elsewhere, restored, and ignored the update notifications for a long while...

    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] Wulff@sh.itjust.works 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

    Well shit... It looks like they were on a good run too.

    https://manjarno.pages.dev/

    [–] p0358@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago

    Nah the page is outdated, I saw on Reddit they also forgot about certs 77 days ago already

    [–] HouseWolf@pawb.social 162 points 20 hours ago (15 children)

    Purple Arch has yet to fail me.

    [–] apftwb@lemmy.world 50 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
    [–] Obnomus@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 hours ago

    I'm stealing that. Thanks.

    [–] irate944@piefed.social 61 points 20 hours ago

    I’m a simple man. I see endeavour OS, I like

    load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 82 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

    Wow. How does this happen when letsencrypt exists? Or certbot?

    More importantly.. How does this happen again?

    [–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 37 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (12 children)

    There is a significant amount of infrastructure that does not support cert bot out there.

    That being said they are using LE but looks like the renew failed.

    https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=manjaro.org&s=116.203.91.91&latest=

    [–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

    I’m not aware of any web server that’s still maintained and has wide adoption (so no web servers written by a teenager in Haskell to just fuck around and figure out how web servers work) that doesn’t support the ACME protocol. I highly doubt Manjaro doesn’t use something mainline like nginx.

    The renew failing should’ve sent someone a warning that manual intervention is required. This happens from time to time but the fact this went longer than a few minutes unfortunately says a lot about the project.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

    There is a significant amount of infrastructure that does not support cert bot out there.

    Skill issue

    load more comments (10 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

    To be fair it's about to get even worse with the much smaller max validity periods.

    [–] Evotech@lemmy.world 18 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

    Either that or they actually automate it

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] halendos@lemmy.world 51 points 19 hours ago

    At this point is more of a tradition...

    [–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

    This is at least the third time, how do they even manage to fail that

    [–] angel@sopuli.xyz 40 points 18 hours ago

    At least the sixth time even. Four cases are documented here and another one was just three months ago. This last link points to reddit, but there a manjaro maintainer also explains why it keeps happening:

    Politics within the project are the issue.

    The fix for these issues have been build for about a year already. But those who have access to stuff like DNS and hosting are currently incapable of making any agreement on any topic preventing trivial fixes such as this from being implemented.

    load more comments
    view more: next ›