Sure studio/publisher consolidation is trashing AAA development but I’d argue that the opposite is true of the indie scene - more and better games than ever.
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
97 points (95.3% liked)
Showerthoughts
40711 readers
1369 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.
Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:
- Both “200” and “160” are 2 minutes in microwave math
- When you’re a kid, you don’t realize you’re also watching your mom and dad grow up.
- More dreams have been destroyed by alarm clocks than anything else
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- No politics
- If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
- A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS
If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.
Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I wouldn't say it's quite as simple as that. It wasn't always a linear downward trend. First couple of generations of video games were pretty terrible from a game development perspective. No disrespect to the developers or anything. Of course, they were amazing programs that took a lot of clever engineering to work, but still not very good games.
The really good games started coming out somewhere in the late '90s, I think? Then reached the peak in either 2000s or 2010s. From there, it's been pretty much a downward trend. Most games in 2026 are so basic and shallow mechanically. AAA games are essentially semi-interactive tech demos.
How many NES games are actually good?
NES games were actually quite expensive. Games were at their cheapest around PS1-X360 and they didn't make bank from whales yet. Which I would also argue were the best times for games.
I think you forgot how many absolutely trash games were being made.
I haven't, there's always trash being made. But the quality and amount of great faves was definitely higher then than it is now
Cartridge games yeah, I was alive and buying 60-80 dollar N64 games. I agree with your peak era opinion.
I think 360/PS3 middle of their lifespan was the beginning of the decline, but that was gradual.
A lot, especially compared to the Atari games which caused the US vg crash. So the seal of quality and limit on amount of games allowed to be published actually meant something.
I get what you're saying but this question is the wrong one.
I don't agree, but my tolerance for mediocrity is admittedly rather low compared to most people. Out of 1370 NES/Famicom games most are garbage, seal or not. Then a lot of mediocre games. Then a small portion of actually stand-out good games. This is true of every console and every era of PC gaming.
More games than ever are released now, OP only considers AAA which has both heavy quality decline combined with far less output thanks to bloated corporations that can't imagine making cheaper games on shorter time scales.
Television has the same problem. Used to get 12-24 episodes a season per year. Now we get 8 episodes with 2+ years between seasons.
Which I'm fine with, indie can be far more creatively interesting (when not pumping out shovelware) than LCD multi million safe bet cater to everyone appeal to no one monetized whaling slop released broken and stuttering for 80 dollars for only the hacked up base game with no respect for art just the dollar.
Compared to what? You don't hear of nearly as many people trying to run PS1 roms...
Here's a free one for you.
Discard pretty much anything learned from or after World of Warcraft. That game warped the genre for decades, largely for the worse.
Go back to MUDs. Iterate from there.
What modern MUDs are there I can play now?
People still play this one. http://mud.arctic.org/
Though I didn't mean it has to necessarily be text-based. More that that ancestral path was more interesting than the WoW one. This is what EverQuest was born from.
One of the bigger differences is that not everything was questing. You just explored, and part of your motivation to level up was the ability to explore places that were previously inaccessible.
Aardwolf is still up and pretty good. Has a special client with some QoL features like mapping.
It's not as good as Project Bob, but sadly that one shut down years ago.
Better games is subjective but I can't imagine less games are released annually now than before
There are fewer studio-made games, which I imagine is what OP meant. Crazy how simpler games were easier to produce, right?
Easier to produce is also relative...
Back in my days, to simply draw a 3d cube on the screen, you had to calculate the position of each corner, calculate normal for each cube face to find which faces should be visible, and fill the area between corners with pixels for each visible face. You did all of this in a memory buffer, so at the end you would swap buffers to show the complete cube on the screen... With current tools, you could make a simple FPS game with a similar amount of effort. The problem is, nobody would care about that FPS game, because it's also easier to recognise low effort garbage nowadays</Old... Nach, I'm still a grumpy old man>
EA saw no profit in CNC, so they trashed the whole franchise. there last chance of money grab was with cnc alliance.
there are still plenty of people making decent (and sometimes amazing) games with almost no budget
sota. RS3 became somewhat slop but still stable, because they TH, and various in-game boosting. now that they are getting rid of most of it, people are pissed, cant have both ways, all because osrs fans complained.
pokemon is another one, is basically slop now ever since swsh, they know people will just spend 60-100 each game so they arnt going to do anything to improve it, game freak said they will do this, apparently they have a stranglehold on IP, so another company cant make the mainline pokemon games.
One could write a paper about how profit motive and art are at odds, and as the portion of agents seeking profit goes up the quality of the art goes down. Probably many people have written quite a bit about that.
I think it's also worse when the people keeping the profits are removed from making the art. Someone who sets out to make a game and make some money on it will probably make better art than a pack of accountants and shareholders calling the shots.
ET for the 2600 would like a word.
No because....nah coz ya see....
dam.....