this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
54 points (95.0% liked)

Europe

10342 readers
1113 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

ETSC highlights five critical areas where recent legislative changes or proposals are actively undermining safety:

  • Small electric vehicle safety β€œfreeze” : a promised 10-year halt on new safety requirements for small EV's, despite 40% of road deaths occurring in the urban environments where these vehicles proliferate.

  • The rise of 60t β€œmegatrucks”: pushing for cross-border movement of massive β€œgigaliners” that pose extreme risks to infrastructure and vulnerable road users.

  • Standards dilution: the risk of a shift toward mutual recognition of US vehicle standards, threatening to flood EU markets with heavier, less-regulated SUVs and pickups.

  • Younger lorry drivers: revisions to the Driving Licence Directive that lower minimum ages for HGV drivers, despite clear evidence of higher risk profiles for younger operators.

  • Technical inspection gaps: leaving 70% of the motorcycle fleet (mopeds and motorcycles up to 125cc) without mandatory EU-wide annual safety checks.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 16 hours ago

Fuck the US and their shitty influence.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Was interested who is lobbying who in this case: https://www.lobbyfacts.eu/datacard/european-transport-safety-council?rid=78891371297-34

Seems like this is mainly the EU lobbying itself 🀦

[–] usernameunnecessary@lemmy.zip 7 points 21 hours ago

Make no mistake, these are the indirect result of US bullying via "mutually agreed trade deals", undermining every single policy the EU has put in place for the benefit of their citizens instead of business entities. The trade deals ARE the lobbying.

The US is in freefall and they're dragging us down with them. From chat control, to unreasonably huge cars in our roads, combined with lax safety standards.

https://www.transportenvironment.org/articles/accepting-us-car-standards-would-risk-european-lives-warn-cities-and-civil-society

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz -2 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Why do yall need annual motorcycle inspections??

[–] MacAnus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I guess for the same reason we need annual car inspections.

Probably something along the lines of : people cant be trusted to keep an eye on their vehicle's condition and we don't want any more pollution and accidents than there already is.

I think it also helps keep vehicles healthy for longer, even though that effect is negated by the fact that we're getting pushed to replace perfectly functional cars with electric ones...

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Bikes are such simple machines though, theres people who can't read but can fix a Honda.

Diagnosing a car problem requires specialist knowledge and equipment, excepting BMWs and some other more technical bikes. Is/was people riding unsafe bikes a problem in Europe, or was car policy just copied over to bikes because reasons?

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Most narrow-minded response in the thread. Wow.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

I see any anti-car groups that oppose motorcycles the same way I see environmental groups that want to close nuclear plants.

Yes ideally they would be unnecessary because we'd have public transit and walkable/bicycle-friendly infrastructure, but for 80% of car users, they can be a drop-in replacement, don't require any political influence like building infrastructure, and help build opposition to car-centric urban design.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 hours ago

We don't - in Spain there's an inspection every 2 years, and it's very basic (like, do the brakes work? Is the engine smoking?)

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

To fill the pockets of inspection operators that get bribe money for passing inspection on shitty vehicles

I know 3 guys in my area that do this, none of them were fined even once.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I have zero doubt that's common, but are corrupt bike inspectors an influential political block? The same applies in US states that require emissions testing, minus the bribery.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

but are corrupt bike inspectors an influential political block?

I'm not sure I understand

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

Surely those bike inspectors, while they benefit, aren't writing bike legislation or telling the guys who do.