this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
39 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

81612 readers
4283 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
39
You no longer need JavaScript (for lots of stuff) (lyra.horse)
submitted 19 hours ago by lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 minutes ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago)

"But CSS sucks”

I believe a lot of the negativity towards CSS stems from not really knowing how to use it. Many developers kind of just skip learning the CSS fundamentals in favor of the more interesting Java- and TypeScript, and then go on to complain about a styling language they don’t understand.

True. I did a HTML+CSS-only gallery when CSS3 just came to be. And was positively surprised a few days ago, that a online gallery viewer had a shareable URL per picture (GET request).

While JS forms should just die. They always lose the content on reload or failed send (because of brittle client-side JS send, instead of using age-old browser-features).

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Sadly the linked example doesn’t seem to work on ios.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Personally I like using server side rendering when I can. The UI should be as light weight as possible and you can do a lot with just HTML and CSS. That said, it's pretty hard to build a responsive web app without at least a little bit of JavaScript.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

That said, it's pretty hard to build a responsive web app without at least a little bit of JavaScript.

Not really. You just need to learn the difference between width and max-width.
I do usercss and 2 of 3 sites use them wrong. That and position: fixed and @media (min-width) overuse.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'm the other way around. For me, the UI can be chonky frameworks or whatever as long as the user experience is good and it works on lots of platforms.

But keep every bit of UI out of my back-end systems. The data and business logic layers should be so divorced from the UI that they didn't even get visitation rights with the kids.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

Modern server side rendering can luckily be separate from your actual back end. Doesn't even have to live in the same server.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 hours ago

That said, it’s pretty hard to build a responsive web app without at least a little bit of JavaScript.

And then the question comes up, why would you need responsiveness. Auto-completion of search results? Hate that crap. Endless scroll with loading additional contents? Hate that crap. Everything blinking and whistling? I suppose JS in that case is possible, but purely for stylistic purposes and not functionality.