this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
45 points (100.0% liked)

electoralism

22246 readers
186 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After touting the importance of libraries as a candidate, Mayor Zohran Mamdani is following in the footsteps of his predecessor by proposing budget cuts that could force service reductions at branches around New York City.

Mamdani’s preliminary budget proposal, which he introduced earlier this week, includes a $29 million cut to the city’s three major library systems. The proposal represents a reversal of one of his campaign promises and is another example of how the new mayor is backtracking on policy commitments as he faces financial and political pressure. The mayor on Wednesday announced he would resume homeless encampment sweeps, despite his earlier pledges to end the practice.

Mamdani has praised libraries both on the campaign trail and as mayor, calling them “critical” to the city’s success. He prompted a surge in e-book downloads at the public libraries last month, when he urged New Yorkers to stay home during the snowstorm and read the bestseller “Heated Rivalry.” While testifying in Albany last week, Mamdani vowed the city would not resort to a “politics of austerity.”

“If you're just going to say, ‘Oh, I love the library,’ but you’re not actually supporting them, then that’s a real disappointment and, frankly, bulls---,” said Abby Emerson, a member of the NYC Public Library Action Network, or NYC PLAN.

Dora Pekec, a spokesperson for the mayor, said in a statement that "the budget crisis we inherited compels us to take an all-of-government approach and use every tool at our disposal to meet the legal mandate to balance the budget, including achieving efficiencies and cutting waste."

Pekec pointed out that the preliminary budget marked the beginning of a months-long budget process.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Given these recent developments I think it's important people read Paying for It - The municipal bond market strangles socialism from The Baffler, published in October of last year. They called this shot by a mile.

Its not enough that he is the Mayor of NYC. Since there are account managers with more power then the Mayor of NYC. He was never able to unilaterally implement a wealth tax, and with no new inflows of cash into the budget, his hands are tied.

The question becomes, how does he frame the issue? Will he identify the structures of the capitalist system that are holding back his project? Will he use this to agitate against capital? Unlikely. Since that bites the hand that feeds you, the bond market and it's dealers.

[–] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Verso published a book a couple of years ago called The Jail is Everywhere: Fighting the New Geography of Mass Incarceration, and this was my main takeaway from that, too. The bonds are what most of the jail expansions and Cop Cities are built on.

( Anna's Archive )

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That sounds like an interesting read.

[–] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah! Each chapter is an account from a different organizing campaign, so there are many antagonists and many different strategies described.

I found my notes - it's the Sacramento chapter that talks about Local Revenue Bonds. The saga culminates in this doomer paragraph: “With no opportunity for public comment during the meeting, the motion passed unanimously, entering the county into a contract with the architecture firm Nacht & Lewis to begin designing the project. This architectural contract would later become a primary tool used by county staff to justify the project even after the board voted against it.”

C'mon! Lucky one time! nope

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

I smell bullshit, does the proposed budget really "cut" 29 million or is there a catch that changes the context completely? Cause that seems to be a recurring pattern with these Zohran hit pieces

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

as not a new yorker that hasn't been following this closely, i'll wait to see before judging the budget negotiations. i'm not clear if this is taking into account the proposed wealth tax.

no, i think the much more obviously unacceptable betrayal is resuming homeless encampment sweeps. any more details on that? they glaze past that atrocity against human rights in this article.