this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
70 points (100.0% liked)

news

24633 readers
533 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MarxMadness@hexbear.net 22 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

From later in that thread:

You cannot endorse candidates on a platform of dismantling zionism. The logic of elections in the US demands moderation, access-seeking, and compromise to zionism (see Mamdami). This is the opposite of liberation. /8

There are certainly imperialist reasons for U.S. politicians to be Zionist, but a lot of them are Zionist due to ~~legalized bribery~~ campaign donations from AIPAC and related groups as well. It's a contradiction to recognize the importance of that financial cudgel, then turn around and say there's no way we can use ~~legalized bribery~~ campaign donations to support candidates who oppose genocide.

If the plan is to support genuinely anti-genocide electeds, I don't think that's a bad strategy. If the plan is to throw money at anyone who occasionally "expresses concern" or something, then yeah, this sucks.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

fighting porkies capital with capital is a losing strategy, i feel, 5 million is like what, 2-3 campaigns? adelson can find that in a cushion. small cities in amerika managed to bds successfully bypassing elected offices electing wise

[–] MarxMadness@hexbear.net 9 points 6 days ago

I'm not saying this is the best possible strategy. I don't think any really great strategy can be financed on only several million dollars. I'm saying if the plan is to essentially reverse AIPAC, there's at least a logic to that, even if it would need to be scaled up to have a major effect (a criticism of every existing effort).

[–] jack@hexbear.net 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why would they be giving their money to mutual aid? They are a political organization. There's no point in them acting as a charity passthrough. People who give them money are doing it so they can organize more effectively. If those donors wanted to give to Palestinian relief funds, they could do so. It's a totally different thing.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

501c3 includes charitable work. Relief funds that are periodically called terrorist networks and shattered? like samidoun?

[–] jack@hexbear.net 3 points 5 days ago

501c3 includes charitable work.

It certainly can; did JVP say that's what they'd do? Is that how their organization told people it would use funds?

There are two claims in this thread that don't hold up. First is the "no money is being sent to Palestinians". Again, that's not what JVP is for. It's for organizing against Zionist policy in the US. They do BDS work. To use that to discredit them is to take an entirely non-political approach and say that the only valid use of funds is direct financial support to Palestinians.

Second is that their 501c4 is an "electoral arm designed to serve the Democrats". What's the basis for that claim? The 501c4 has been the primary part of the organization doing all their divestment work all over the country. What have they actually done to serve the Democrats? There's a lot here about "follow the money". Ok. The money doesn't move from the c3 to c4. Now what?

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] plinky@hexbear.net 3 points 6 days ago

grifters or ngo-brained libs, find out next time, on hexestigations the-more-you-know

i don't think they are malicious, but christ