this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
165 points (100.0% liked)

World News

53775 readers
2279 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Speaking in Munich, Volodymyr Zelenskyy also called for a clear date for his country to be allowed to join the EU

Ukraine wants security guarantees for a minimum of 20 years from the US before it can sign a peace deal with dignity, Volodymyr Zelenskyy said ahead of talks with Russia and the US scheduled for next week.

Speaking in Munich on Saturday, he also called for a clear date for Ukraine to be allowed to join the EU. Some EU officials have put the date as early as 2027.

Speaking to the annual Munich security summit, Ukraine’s president said he hoped “the trilateral meetings next week will be serious, substantive, helpful for all of us but, honestly, sometimes it feels like the sides are talking about completely different things”.

“The Americans often return to the topic of concessions and too often those concessions are discussed only in the context of Ukraine, not Russia,” he added.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

I wouldn't trust the us government to tie my shoes, let alone guarantee anything. And I mean anything at all.
They can't be trusted. Full stop. The end.

[–] vpol@feddit.uk 75 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I wouldn’t trust anything coming out of the US government’s mouth. Until pedo ring ruling the country is gone.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 8 hours ago

Especially since we ignored the last guarantee of protection we gave them.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 26 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

As an American in my 30s...

Just don't trust anything the US says, period.

Who knows if our 4-year mood/tantrum cycle will honor the deal in 15 years, let alone 5.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 hours ago

FYI, it's "in 5 years, let alone 15"

[–] Tja@programming.dev 28 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The security guarantees won't be worth the paper they are written on.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Didn't the US give Ukraine security guarantees in 1994?

What happened to those 20 years later?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

Not really, unfortunately, here's my previous comment about it:

https://programming.dev/comment/22199272

[–] Delilah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

No guarantees were given, just non binding security assurances, not that the US government actually gives a fuck about laws or treaties

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If we have to get into the weeds of the differences between "guarantees" and "assurances," the country in question (the US) is not a trustworthy ally.

[–] Delilah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 hours ago

The US is not trustworthy.

When you are talking about legal documents(like a treaty), the language matters immensely. It's literally the reason lawyers exist.

The difference between a guaranty and and assurance should have let the Ukrainian government know the US government was never planning on helping fight Russia.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 8 hours ago

Even then ... 20 years is a long time. Who's to say the US won't elect another Russian-puppet pedo within that time?

[–] DABDA@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 14 hours ago
[–] fortnitefinn@sh.itjust.works 15 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't NATO/US/Western countries give security guarantees to Ukraine for Ukraine giving up their nuclear arsenal?

How did that turn out?

[–] Lewo@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The Budapest Memorandum was initially signed by Ukarine, Russia, United States and United Kingdom, "assuring" the security of Ukraine in exchange for giving up their nuclear arsenal. But afaik it doesn't really imply any legal obligations. I assume that the new agreement would involve more concrete conditions and responsibilities.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 8 hours ago

I assume that the new agreement would involve more concrete conditions and responsibilities

And what happens when (not if) the Trump administration (or some even worse successor) ignores those concrete conditions and responsibilities? Is Ukraine going to sue the USA in international court while they're being overrun?

There's no 'security guarantee' out there anymore that could possibly be worth the paper it's written on.

If I were in charge of Ukraine right now, I'd be looking for 'security guarantees' in the form of mutual defense pacts with other countries in the region that could be in a similar situation. Poland, Finland, etc. Those might actually have your back, since they know that they're next if you fall.

[–] redditmademedoit@piefed.zip 9 points 13 hours ago

The US is walking a fine line between undermining any given security guarantees to the point of being worthless, cheap talk and sounding "woke" by offering any.

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 31 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

The US gave guarantees when they gave the nukes to Russia. We failed them. We will not honor these as well. Making a treaty with the US is folly.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 8 hours ago

Making a treaty with the US is folly.

Yep. If you need confirmation, just ask any Native American.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Not true. I thought so too, but apparently it was a guarantee to:

  • respect Ukraine's territory (which Russia vialoted, the US didn't)

  • bring any violations to the UN security council (which was done, but with Russia having veto power, useless)

That being said, I agree that any treaty with the US is absolutely worthless, we can ask Greenland about that.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

it was a guarantee to:

respect Ukraine’s territory (which Russia vialoted, the US didn’t)

bring any violations to the UN security council (which was done, but with Russia having veto power, useless)

Most people I speak to have the impression that any attack on Ukraine meant the US would jump into full scale war mode to defend them. Honestly I wish it were. At least then it would have been harder for the Biden administration to essentially ignore.

"here's a bunch of old equipment, good luck buddy" was technically more than required, but grossly inadequate.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 8 hours ago

Yeah... I don't really want to see US infantry on the ground in Ukraine, but I would have really liked to see the US enforce a no-fly zone over contested areas and maybe also bomb the shit out of Russian forces in Ukraine from the air.

Hitting targets inside Russia could be politically nonviable, as it probably violates some international laws, but with Ukraine's permission, they could absolutely hit anything they wanted inside Ukrainian territory.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 12 points 15 hours ago

Like the last "security" agreement with Russia? Russia go home agreement or die.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 11 hours ago

EU is not going to like the fact that Ukraine wants to join the EU this quickly. Corruption is still a massive issue and because of the war, the Euro will lose value, as billions will be pumped in that country.