this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
32 points (100.0% liked)

electoralism

22246 readers
206 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

MAGA is clear about its intentions to attempt another coup, and the centrist forces at the heart of the Democratic Party have proven that they will be unable to resist it. We need a movement led by the socialist left and a presidential candidate like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to both resist the coup, and move our nation toward a functioning democracy.

The ascendant faction of the Republican Party is organizing to steal the 2028 Congressional and Presidential elections and cement minority rule over all three branches of the government of the United States. The centrist leadership of the Democratic Party is clearly inadequate to the task of stopping them.

Over the next three years, the Left must seize the initiative and lead a broad-based popular mobilization to try to prevent authoritarian rule.

The urgency of forming such a movement makes the 2028 presidential campaign a critical site of intervention for the Left—we need a campaign that both can win the Democratic primary and lead an organized, mobilized popular movement into confrontation with the forces of authoritarianism.

Programmatically, that movement will fail if it is based on an abstract appeal to “democracy” alone: instead, it must be rooted in an ambitious, popular program that connects with working people and is grounded in the reality of our daily lives. In scope, the movement needs a broad base of many millions of people who do not just passively oppose the Trump administration but are prepared to take action to confront it. In terms of structure, that mass base cannot be held together by a thin layer of NGOs or by labor unions (representing only 10% of US workers), but must instead be united by a committed layer of organic leaders across every sector of our society.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 34 points 4 days ago

Movement led by the socialist left.. broad-based popular mobilization.. ambitious, popular program

Looks inside dead-dove-2

It's just about getting the Democrat party into power dead-dove-3

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

We need a movement led by the socialist left

lets-fucking-go

and a presidential candidate like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

cringe

[–] da_gay_pussy_eatah@hexbear.net 31 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Yeah totally, only AOC can save us now!

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago

i stopped reading right there

[–] TheLastHero@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago

probably the best thing AOC can do for the left is get executed and martyred by trumpist goons. Because she's made it clear that she's a social fascist who seeks to extend the life of capitalism.

[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 19 points 4 days ago

Only a vanguard Marxist-Leninist party can lead the proletariat through this dark time

[–] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In terms of structure, that mass base cannot be held together by a thin layer of NGOs or by labor unions (representing only 10% of US workers), but must instead be united by a committed layer of organic leaders across every sector of our society.

This is how you know they're full of shit. Just spontaneously follow the leaders - because that strategy has just been killing it for the last century.

No actually to resist fascism you need durable institutions of the proletariat class, primarily a vanguard party and a strong labor movement. It's incredible that anyone thinks we can organize some sort of vague group of "organic leaders" to resist fascism but we can't organize workers into existing or new unions. This isn't to say our existing labor unions aren't dogshit but that's a separate critique. We need a vibrant worker's movement if we want anything good to happen.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They want 'organic leaders' (meaningless term) because actually confronting the task of building parallel institutions by the working class, for the working class, is an incredibly daunting task.

Also 'from all sectors of society' just means they want the richest ghouls of the 'organic leaders' to default be in charge of the movement, because they are the ones who will have the most time and money to influence the overall structure.

[–] curmudgeonthefrog@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

In union spaces we sometimes use the term organic leader to refer to people with or without institutional power that people like and respect. Someone who can meaningfully move their coworkers to take action. Instead of convincing each person in a department alone, you identify the organic leader, develop their knowledge of unions and skills and they can set to work moving their coworkers. Our goal was usually 1 leader to 10 or 20 workers. Obviously a different scale then what the article is thinking of for organic leaders.

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We need a movement led by the socialist left and a presidential candidate like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to

Almost had me going for a second here

[–] red_giant@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What if we voted extremely hard this time?

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago

I hear California voted SUPER hard and they now have Universal Healthcare and full public utilities!

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

and the centrist forces at the heart of the Democratic Party have proven that they will be unable to resist it.

Here's how you know the writer is a naive liberal. The demon-rat party isn't unable to resist the reactionary death drive, it's simultaneously enabling it while preventing any progressive measures to boo-boo bandaid over the increasing number of hemorrhaging wounds in the beast of America.

Completely wrote off the author and the article in the first sentence.

[–] Ildsaye@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

football-lucy how do you do, fellow antifascists?

[–] onwardknave@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You're not going to add me to the List again, right?

[–] Crucible@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago

We can't do anything about the police state, the economy, foreign policy, imperialism, we can't even get an impeachment that sticks, but trust us in 3 years we are going to be the axis of resistance

[–] happybaby@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago
[–] red_giant@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We must be able to stage a “mass refusal”—refusal to accept election interference, refusal to accept fraudulent electors, refusal to allow those electors to meet with Congress, refusal to let congress meet, refusal to comply with an illegitimate government, and refusal to let society continue as usual as long as an illegitimate government is in place.

If everyone says “I refuse” at midnight tomorrow then the future is ours

[–] red_giant@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago

Given the lack of working-class organization in the US, the potentially electrifying power of a nationwide left-wing campaign is an unparalleled vehicle for reaching people at scale.

Given the lack of horses, the potentially electrifying power of a nationwide carriage is an unparalleled vehicle.