this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
54 points (98.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

14896 readers
950 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just use exponential, income based fines.

Something like: 5% of your monthly salary or 0.05% of your networth, whichever is higher, adjusted by how much you were speeding of course.

Then double the fine for each infraction within one year after the first.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this is how all fines should be although I would go 1% yearly or .1% net worth just because some people don't work all year.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're gonna need a provision for people who don't have an income.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

good point. might need to have public service for that case or even people below an income threshold were even 1% can screw them up massively.

[–] BananaLama@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

I don't believe cities are incentivized to enforce traffic laws to make cities safer.

The only incentive is to make them money. Every infraction I've seen for myself or anyone i know was waved away for more money.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've always wondered why they don't put speed limiting devices on cars already. I know it's a loss of freedom or whatever, but logically if speeding is unsafe shouldn't we try to make people stop? Not by punishing offenders, but by making it impossible to screw up in the first place.

[–] Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago

https://www.treehugger.com/big-surprise-car-industry-doesnt-idea-speed-governors-4852929

They used to be required, but the car industry knew that it pointed to the driver being responsible for collisions, so they lobbied to have the requirement dropped.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago

Seriously. Put a transponder in every car and on every speed limit sign. Done.