this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
193 points (96.6% liked)

NiceMemes

2408 readers
323 users here now

A place to post memes & images that won't absolutely obliterate your mental health! Memes must not stray into hopelessness and be generally positive or neutral.

I made this with my kid in mind, so that they can have a good, safe place to look at memes, just made to make folks laugh and smile!

Only goofs & silliness. (:

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Slashme@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

Longtime cat owner here: those paw prints were staged by a human.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 8 points 11 hours ago

"Your honor, she forced my paws upon that dough to score some internet points. I swear!"

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago

Whats the charge? Eating a meal? A succulent Chinese meal?

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 hours ago
[–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the defence pleads not guilty, based on the irrefutable evidence that those paw prints were made by a human.

1 the two prints on the left appear to be different shapes meaning the lower one would have been made by a back paw. Cats can't fully retract their back claws because they are used for traction when running, not offensive purposes. There are no claw marks.

2 there is no disturbance to the obviously soft dough. A cat being lifted would grip the dough causing tearing both front and back and a cat jumping off the dough would result in tearing to the rear print.

The defence rests

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 45 minutes ago

Could be a few probing taps before declaring the ground unstable and icky and not worth the heat.

Say two front paws, a backtrack, some contemplation then another single paw attempt. This also matches the shallower third print.

If there were more pixels to the images maybe more could be said.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

If the dough don't fit, you must acquit!

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You've been hit by— You've been struck by a smooth criminal

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 1 points 13 hours ago

Just making sure you're up to date on your intestinal parasites.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Objection!

There is no mens rea!

Case dismissed!

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago

It's two!

It's Latin. It's used in legalese and roughly translates to "guilty mind"

The concept behind it as a legal term is based around whether the accused had intent or not, but also whether or not they could form intent.

No way is that little angel forming any intent of evil.

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago

jury mewllification time

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago

Baking biscuits: okay

Baking pie: not okay?

Humans are weird.