this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
14 points (100.0% liked)

Interesting Shares

2595 readers
18 users here now

Fascinating articles, captivating images, satisfying videos, interesting projects, stunning research and more.

Share something you find incredibly interesting.


Prefix must be included in the title!


Mandatory prefixes for posts

It helps to see at glance what post is about and certain clients also offer filters that make prefixes searchable/filterable.

Note: Photon (m.lemmy.zip) frontend used for links above.


Icon attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What if, though, “selves” are present in those very cells, ahead of the point at which they merge to form a greater whole? It might sound outlandish, but biological simulations are indicating that those minuscule units of life, which we usually think about as passive machines – cogs blindly governed by the laws of physics – have their own goals and display agency. Surprisingly, even simple networks of biomolecules appear to display some degree of a self, a revelation that could lead to novel ways of treating health conditions with far fewer side effects.

What’s more, some biologists say this new grasp of selfhood can reveal what is special about life and how it began in the first place. “The origins of agency coincide with the origins of life,” says cognitive scientist Tom Froese at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology in Japan.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Waveform@multiverse.soulism.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love these kinds of deep dives. If intelligence is happening at this scale, it suggests that "mind" might be the substrate of reality rather than just a byproduct of biology.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I have always been fascinated by Christopher Alexander's arguments that life is a property that can be measured for a given space, that rather than being an impossible philosophical question life and intelligence are a product of particular architectures that can be organically enhanced with the addition of other nuanced structures.

To see life and intelligence this way is so much more exciting to me than any chemist's binary definition of life they would employ by severing each constituent element into smaller and smaller pieces until it can be sufficiently interrogated and dissected to subdue and encapsulate the essence of life as if it were no more than a fraudently magic trickster presence to be caught and jailed within the known and exploitable.

No, the magic of life and intelligence is an analog not digital value and it inherently resides in summation, it can never be found within the individual elements.

“If we are to use the theory of centers – and the concept of life – as the basis of all architecture, it would be reassuring to know that wholeness, together with the properties which bring centers to life, is a necessary feature of material reality, not merely a psychological aspect of things which arises during perception of works of art.

… According to a ‘cognitive’ interpretation, the centers could merely exist in the mind’s eye … and the fifteen properties … could also exist merely as artifacts of cognition …

… I shall argue that nature too is understandable in terms of wholeness … I shall try to show that the structure of centers I call wholeness goes deeper than mere cognition, is linked to the functional and practical behavior of the natural world … and is as much at the foundation of physics and biology as it is of architecture.

https://iamronen.com/blog/2018/03/24/christopher-alexander-the-fifteen-properties-in-nature/

[–] marcela@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago

For example, opioids like morphine provide effective relief from chronic pain, but people quickly develop tolerance to such drugs and the only option is to increase the dose, which can lead to addiction and, later on, withdrawal risks.

This is not even how opioids lead to addiction. They are antagonists of endorphin receptors. On another note, AFAIK tolerance and addictiveness are separate aspects of psychoactive substances, not causally related as implied by the article.

It makes me wonder, in the aftermath of an opioid epidemic created by corporate greed, why some people would try to "fix opioids" in that regard.

[–] Trudge@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

well the free half was interesting :)