this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
95 points (100.0% liked)

Space

2146 readers
7 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

So, the data centers on the ground are thousands of feet across, cost billions of dollars to build, consume so much electricity that they're struggling to power them (making them resort to things like on-site gas turbines), and produce so much heat that they consume entire towns water supplies to feed their evaporative coolers.

Clearly the solution to these problems is to put the computers into a space constrained container, pay thousands of extra dollars per lb of equipment to launch it into space, where the only way to generate power is with solar panels (that are also space constrained and you also have to pay to launch), and where there is no atmosphere to act as a heat sink let alone water. Oh, and also the chips can be exposed to particle and EM radiation much more easily up there too.

EDIT: I realize that my comment is mostly just restating parts of the article, but its just hilarious to me how perfectly every space-related complication corresponds to things they're already struggling with on earth. And then there's radiation on top of that. Its like some guy complaining about how its too hot and wet in Florida, so he moves to the middle of the Amazon rainforest. And his new house has an active beehive inside it.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago

There is one key difference: lack of regulation. To me, it still sounds like a dumb idea, but I'm also not a greedy sociopathic fuckstain, so....

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

what about billionaires in space?

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Only if spinlaunch sends them there without a vessel.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Yikes, it doesn't matter how spinlaunch sends you there. 200+ Gs are not friendly to the human body...

[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

You slap the word "AI" on something and investors and investing algorithms will throw money at you with both hands.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

I can also add the fact that even the best AI data centers need constant human intervention.

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Great way to get some of that juicy space money

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 2 points 5 days ago

But how else will elon mine and distribute child porn without having to deal with innovation-stifling government?

Much cheaper to create floating rigs in the ocean for them