One of the many good cases for land value taxes
this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
127 points (99.2% liked)
politics
28130 readers
2386 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, cuz what we need is to price half our population out of being able to even live in a house or apartment. I am currently in a situation where the place I've been living for an extended time is being sold and the new owner doesn't want me to live here so I have to find something else that I can afford that's anywhere near the same as this. By the way that doesn't exist here
Shocking news has landed. In a move everyone could see coming from a mile away, a real estate guy wants real estate prices to continue climbing, even to unreachable levels. More at 6.
The landlord-in-chief
The boomers will love it
To be clear, the biggest voting block is boomers, and since they own homes, they profit from rising prices.
Unfortunately, his voting block is cross generational, though there is a bit of an older skew
I'm mostly talking about voter participation. Also since there are a LOT of boomers, they have the most votes. 
Can we get the raw numerical counts for this? We’re comparing percentages which is bad practice. I.e. it wouldn’t matter if 90% of 65+ voters vote if it’s like 1000 people. Turnout isn’t the same as actual votes cast which I think you understand but you didn’t add a source to your “LOT of boomers” claim. Not saying that you’re incorrect but I’d like to see actual numbers if possible
Some rough estimations:
Number of Boomers: 67 mio. With 75% turnout: 50.25 mio.
Number of GenX: 65 mio. With 70% turnout: 45.5 mio.
Number of Millenials: 74 mio. With 60% turnout: 44.5 mio.
Number of GenZ above 18: ~20mio. With 48% turnout: 9.6 mio.
The USA is a geriatricacy. Not even just by the numbers, young people give up so much power by not voting.
Edit: Formatting
Thanks for the stats! Hm that is truly depressing. Even with better turnout there are so many fricken boomers damn. I guess that makes sense given the generation moniker. Is this based on 2024 data? I’m somewhat inclined to believe that low Gen Z voter turnout is at least partially a symptom of being disengaged from the Democratic Party putting out machine candidates all the time but I of course have no way to quantify that atm.
That's inflation, dude. You're basically stating outright that you want higher inflation.
He wants the biggliest inflation anyone's ever seen. Inflation so yuge Venezuela will be impressed.
Did y'all know we're giving $9B in missiles to the 9/11 guys?
$9B. In missiles. To the Saudis.
But no, totally, let's make getting a roof over Americans heads more difficult because America First or something.
Failed real estate guy wants housing prices to continue to rise.
At 11 Water is wet?