this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
232 points (90.8% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2750 readers
419 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Jay Pritzker

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

American democracy is selecting whether you wont to be hit in the face or the groin, and then being handed a "I voted" sticker to wear on your shirt.

I might try "groin" next time just to mix it up. Yes, I know I am terrible and I am why the system sucks. I know.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

They'll run Weekend at Biden's before they let AOC have a go.

[–] The_Almighty_Walrus@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago
[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 hours ago

This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard

[–] HaveAnotherTacoPDX@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This plan didn't work with Trump in 2016. Republicans rammed him in where he wasn't (shouldn't have been) welcome because they refused to allow any other candidate. In the same election, Democrats let their party officials to ram Hillary through because the party wouldn't accept Bernie.

Suggest we find someone WE like and do what Republicans did. It doesn't matter if it's an "outsider" or not, but I'd appreciate it if we could not pick a child rapist and sex trafficker, kthx!

I genuinely think our candidate hasn't really made themselves known to be willing to run yet. I don't think it's AOC this time, though I think she's got what it takes to do the job. I don't think it's Harris, people still feel burned by 2020. I hope we can do better than Newsom.

Kinda still want to draft Jon Stewart because he genuinely gives a fuck, can communicate like few others, knows how to be damned serious when he needs to be, and if he were on that list today he'd be near the top if not at it, just like that. And when asked, he didn't say no. We could do far worse and still be okay.

But yeah, I'm waiting to see what happens. I don't think the candidate I want that I'm sure will win is on the field yet. But I hope AOC is the running mate, whoever that person winds up being.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

If the party really wanted to stop Trump, they would've done what the democrats did to Bernie. Hell, the democrats themselves helped Trump: https://www.salon.com/2016/11/09/the-hillary-clinton-campaign-intentionally-created-donald-trump-with-its-pied-piper-strategy/

You can see with how quickly all the oligarchs lined up to kiss Trump's ass that they're perfectly happy with him being in power.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Jon Stewart admitted he was in the Epstien Files. He was mentioned by Epstein as the type of person they needed to "properly present" one of their stories/ lies.

He didn't have to admit anything. He just wants to be as honest and transparent with people as he can be.

Some of his recent interviews have given me the tiniest shred of hope that he may run. He isn't flatly shutting down the idea any more. He isn't saying he will run, but he used to be vehemently against the idea.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It's depressing that a fucking comedian is legitimately one of the better options for a presidential candidate.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, maybe they should find someone more qualified like a banker or a lawyer.

On the other hand, a comedian has been thwarting one of the richest, most powerful men in the world for the last 4 years.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

As opposed to the usual economic parasite from the owner class?

The things a person does for a living or a hobby do not make someone more or less fit for an elected position. Their character, intelligence, and ideals do. Jon Stewart has all of those qualities.

There is only one name on the above list that shouldn’t be repeatedly kicked in the face and barred from any position of authority, and that’s AOC. Everyone else is corrupt as hell.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Democrats spent years neglecting State and County elections to focus their main attention on flashy National races that could bring in big donors. Coupled with how Democrats with name recognition like to park their asses in Congress until they're frail and elderly, never making way for the next generation, there's just not a deep pool of talent to draw on for the Presidency.

AOC is the candidate I see available who would be the best suited for the actual White House but I have doubts she could win the Primary or the General. Gavin might be electable but his problems are deep enough they might discourage folks Left of Center from backing him and I really wouldn't want him in the White House anyways. Mark Kelly is getting his name tossed around. I don't know enough about him to know how I'd feel about electing him. He might be electable though. He's getting National name recognition with his battle against Hegseth. He's a moderate and a military veteran with appeal among Independents. He doesn't seem to have any real controversies and he's new enough to politics to not have alot of baggage or strong negative opinions attached to him (though that could change in 3 years). JB Pritzker being a billionaire would hurt him among Leftists but he could win both the Primaries and General I think. His wealth could help him rally support from both the Upper Classes and Democratic party insiders. His relative lack of controversy or strong negative opinions about him would help him in the General as would his growing name recognition on the National stage. Plus he's isn't afraid to go for the political jugular when he needs too. Personally don't want a Billionaire as president but I would prefer him over Newsom. And Kamala is a joke. She'll have even less support this time then last time. If super delegates start to rally around her, you'll know for a fact she's the controlled opposition candidate.

Mark Kelly is a pretty respectable dude who should have wide appeal, even if he's not super progressive. Pritzker could do it, you're right. Either one of these two saying they want AOC as a running mate (and actually listening to her) elevates them on my list of candidates immediately.

[–] oh_@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Harris needs to retire. You don’t lose to Trump and get to run again.

[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

If she was ever able to win a Democratic primary they wouldn't have gone through so much trouble to avoid having one in the last election.

[–] HaveAnotherTacoPDX@lemmy.today 7 points 23 hours ago

She lost to Trump AND Biden.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hate to tell you, but a hardcore progressive will not be nominated. As they always do, the party leadership will decide that the way to beat MAGA is to be MAGA.

Stop obsessing over the presidency. You want revolution? All politics is local. Start by putting younger progressives on planning commissions, school boards. Move up to city councils, county supervisor. Then start taking state offices. You have to elect progressives to local offices for name recognition.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Fortunately this is happening, and has been for a decade now. We need to keep it up.

load more comments
view more: next ›