Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Instructed by whom, exactly? The article doesn't say. It just says "a source in the Republican establishment". That could be anyone.
My money is on Stephen Miller. It sounds like a thing he would say....
Instructed by themselves and each other. They don't need to be told to circle the wagons.
The article was quite clear that they were told by someone in the Administration.
No, they don't need to be told to hold the partisan line, but I wouldn't put it past Trump (or even Stephen Miller) to treat them like employees. Which must be a bit humiliating for a Member of Congress.....
Pam Bondi is a cunt.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Pam Bondi is a bag of discarded foreskins.
That is honestly an insult to cunts everywhere
She lacks the warmth and depth to be a cunt...
I'm calling bullshit on this.
Has no one here ever watched one of these shit show hearings? They will happily clean Pam's shoes with their tongue with no prompting at all.
Might be that Miller doesn't want the pubs to go after Clinton
Honestly if they somehow conduct an entire inquiry without bringing that up it will be inconceivably suspicious in its absence. I feel like that would make the Republican members appear MORE guilty, not less. If you're a Republican who had nothing whatsoever to do with Epstein, you've gotta consider that avoiding the single largest and most disturbing cover up in (potentially global) political history is essentially going to drag you right into it.
I’m sick of the corruption. But more than that I’m just so sick of the immaturity.
Huh.
Why not?
I thought this was the most transparent administration in history? Why would something like the most notorious pedophile ring be off-limits?
Transparently Corrupt!
Pam Bondi is a cunt
am I missing something though, I'm assuming there's like 18 democrats inn that committee so, what good does giving them the monopoly on questions on anything that matters.
If it’s anything like last time Bondi will just attack Dems instead of responding.
No, it's just stupid as always with these people.
Gotta protect those pedophiles.
Other banned topics include the law, crimes, discrimination, investigation, the Department of "Justice", and people whose name contain an N an A, an R, or an I.
Also, is Pam Blondi going to be bringing her little burn book again?
"You guys are stupid, and have stupid mean faces" Also, Kevin at school had a BONER in class today. Ew."
Why not? Donald’s not even in them. Right?