this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
150 points (89.1% liked)

Selfhosted

56127 readers
937 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm building OpenWatch, an open-source self-hosted video platform as an alternative to YouTube. It's designed for content creators who want to back up their content on their own infrastructure (in case of strikes) or for anyone who wants a personal video hosting solution.

The project is in early stages, but I've built out some core features:

  • Home feed
  • Video player with adaptive streaming
  • Playlists
  • Interactions (likes, comments, subscriptions)
  • Creator Studio (dashboard, content management, channel customization)

Tech stack: 

  • Next.js 16
  • Tailwind CSS v4
  • Drizzle ORM (PostgreSQL)
  • FFmpeg
  • HLS.js
  • Zustand
  • Docker

GitHub: https://github.com/openwatch-app/openwatch

Feedback would be helpful, especially around self-hosting considerations and features you'd find useful.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Liketearsinrain@lemmy.ml 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Not federated, seemingly vibecoded, MIT. Peertube exists, not sure this makes a ton of sense as an alternative but good luck otherwise.

[–] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Update 02/07:

  • Changed license to MIT
  • Made first steps for implementing Federation, now you can search and view videos and channels from other platforms, more features in this direction coming in the future

Thank you for all the feedback received!

[–] zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Mit license allows the use for commercial purposes without funding, which if it becomes popular and adopted you would have to support it without any kick backs. Please look into GPLv3

[–] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 2 points 11 hours ago

Thanks for the feedback

[–] 5PACEBAR@piefed.ca 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Doesn't matter there we'll never be a replacement for YouTube the cost is to great. Think of the storage they barely remove videos they just stay up there.

[–] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club -3 points 11 hours ago

Doesn’t matter there we’ll never be a replacement for YouTube the cost is to great. Think of the storage they barely remove videos they just stay up there.

I never said it's a YouTube replacement :)

[–] boogiebored@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Decentralized video streaming? Like torrenting but encrypted traffic from disparate nodes like Storj? Not that tech, but something in that vein.

Also how Tor works but that would be slow af.

🤔💭

[–] Liketearsinrain@lemmy.ml 3 points 21 hours ago

That's how peertube works for streaming (not storage), with P2P

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Yea someone argued that "it's not impossible to replace YouTube, [x] also stores massive amounts of videos" where I don't remember what x was, but I'm fairly sure their massive amounts of videos is less than what gets uploaded to YouTube in a day, maybe an hour.

[–] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 1 points 23 hours ago

I'm working on this

[–] fum@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why would anyone use this non FOSS vibe coded thing instead of PeerTube? Copying YouTube's UX is not a good enough reason when better FOSS alternatives already exist.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Wdym non FOSS? It's MIT. That's still FOSS even if it's not the flavor of FOSS you prefer

[–] fum@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They changed the licence to MIT after my post. So good on them. The original licence was non FOSS. You can see it in the git history if you're interested.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

Ah fair enough

[–] mike_wooskey@lemmy.thewooskeys.com 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't care if AI was used in its creation. I do care if it's FOSS/libre.

And also, it's a bit weird to me that copying YouTube's UI is considered good. I havent used YouTube in a long time, but I recall there being some good aspects and some bad. Why not create your own vesion of a UI?

[–] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 day ago

And also, it’s a bit weird to me that copying YouTube’s UI is considered good. I havent used YouTube in a long time, but I recall there being some good aspects and some bad. Why not create your own vesion of a UI?

I completely understand your point of view. But I want to make something that's easier for YouTube users to migrate to.

[–] WarnikOdinson@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Makes it easier for people to move over, and more willing to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] squirrel@piefed.kobel.fyi 77 points 2 days ago (2 children)

put ActivityPub in it :)

But seriously, a PeerTube compatible software with a different approach than PeerTube could be good for the federated video ecosystem.

[–] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for the feedback :)

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

While many in fedi will say the above, a simple federated search model could increase adoption. I.E. don't bother going crazy with it, just add a discovery platform where you can search "your own" or "the network".

[–] hornedfiend@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

For sure, an ActivityPub video platform that is not TikTok like (i.e Loops) would be amazing.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So what is the difference between this and PeerTube?

[–] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Hey, thanks for the question. I want to build an experience much more similar to YouTube, with a more similar design and flow.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you think you could work towards ActivityPub integration so it would be able to talk to PeerTube instances? IMO diversity is strength but cooperation is a factor in success. Hope this project goes well and is fun 😁

[–] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you think you could work towards ActivityPub integration so it would be able to talk to PeerTube instances? IMO diversity is strength but cooperation is a factor in success. Hope this project goes well and is fun 😁

Sure, I'll add that to the list. Thanks for the feedback :)

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

It would be a killer feature for us in the fedi. :)

Peertube is awesome, but more alternatives in the space would be welcome.

[–] jlow@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

How is the design and flow of Peertube different from YT, can you give e few examples? For me they are super similar (there's a video feed, I click on one, I get a page with videos that has comments and related videos).

[–] bisserkr@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That repo looks like someone vibe coded a YouTube clone

[–] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, I use AI but not entirely

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thank you for the warning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ozoned@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absolute best of luck to you! :) We need more diversity in software!

I hope AcitivityPub or some federation mechanism is being supported. :)

If you ever want to come on a podcast, Fireside Fedi, let me know. :)

Also if/when you're ever needing someone to test the software I'm starting another show called Works On My Machine Live where I install the software and talk to the dev during it.

[–] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago

Thanks for the feedback :)

[–] mike_wooskey@lemmy.thewooskeys.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree that more options is a good thing, and that activitypub would be a plus. But FYI, I wont be using it because of the license. I use only FOSS whenevr possible.

[–] klangcola@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good catch, that licence does not look very Libre =\

[–] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Good catch, that licence does not look very Libre =\

Thanks for the feedback, it was already changed it

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Okay, why this over peertube?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thoralf@discuss.familie-will.at 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

An alternative approach to PeerTube would be very welcome. ActivityPub-integration is a must for me, though.

[–] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago

Thanks. It's already on the list.

[–] pfr@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This looks cool. Good luck with it

[–] ge0rg3e@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago
[–] Ash@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›