this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
10 points (91.7% liked)

Asklemmy

52805 readers
244 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I asked this question recently, unfortunately it did not get me closer to an actionable answer. Of course clothes get damaged and stuff is in the lint drawer, but it is a huge difference between losing the longevity by a 1% and 30%. Any actual research would be tremendously helpful.

https://vger.to/lemmy.ml/post/42648344

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago

Personal study from memory: I have t-shirts that have always been washer/dryer treated. Depending on the quality of fabric most have fallen apart in a few to 10 yrs, though I do have like 4 that are 30 yrs old

[โ€“] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago

I don't have a study, but the tumbling and rubbing wears on clothes, compared to hanging to dry.

Some good shirts you will notice the collar seams and other edges start to wear.

In some cases like jeans and cotton cashual henley style shirts this gives a softening effect.

[โ€“] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

it is a huge difference between losing the longevity by a 1% and 30%.

Even if it's only a couple percentage pts, it doesn't seem hard to imagine how that could quickly add up over a few washes. You're asking for research, but I'm curious what the actual situation is that you're dealing with. Is it a case for example of having very little convenient area in which to hang clothes to dry?

Btw, there are no-heat spin dryers, hand-cranked wringers, and other alternative devices to help dry clothes as quickly as possible, without heat...

[โ€“] ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Currently we dry clothes in our wardrobe. We got rid of the dryer and decided to adapt our wardrobe to accommodate drying our clothes. So now we just hang them wet in our wardrobe. I am interested to know how much we extend the lifespan of our clothes by doing this instead

[โ€“] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 1 points 7 hours ago

Your wardrobe, eh? Something like this, maybe?
https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/nordkisa-open-wardrobe-with-sliding-door-bamboo-00439468/

Anyway, GPT5.2 had some interesting things to say, with citations:
https://chatgpt.com/s/t_6984f12432ac81919662025a7302e0d6

[โ€“] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago

This isn't scientific, but was recently listening to a podcast where they interviewed someone (18 minutes in) who does laundry for the Nets basketball team, and he said that the dryer basically bakes in any sweat or blood or stains which don't get washed off before. I'm not sure how this affects longevity of the fabric, but from a usability standpoint, if your clothes are permanently stained, you probably will stop wearing them.

[โ€“] plinky@hexbear.net 2 points 11 hours ago

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15440478.2025.2549597

somewhat close (they basically measure shedding, although mainly about speed of drum importance (seems like both fixed fast rotation or very slow are better), but it doesn't seem there is dramatic increase over cycles (the first is the worst, evidently, see fig 5), but they don't do 100 cycles, you cna search around in theirs citations for more prolly.