Gonna ask all the libs who told me Bezos was protecting free media and saving WaPo by buying it how that's going for them
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
37 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
847 readers
493 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It's okay, because he wasn't saving it by employing enough journalists, but by protecting the editorial independence of the paper /s
Economy runs on people buying things.
Rich people get all the money because “they deserve it for being perfect”
the rich save their money for the sake of saving it
They shrink their workforces to nothing, literally spending LESS money
unemployed people have no money to spend
rich people don’t spend money by choice.
national decline
“How could this happen?!?!”
Democracy dies in Darkness™
Good, now do the NYT
Unfortunately they're probably firing the in-depth reporting part and keeping all the terrible editorialized crap that we hate on.
With the layoffs, the person said, The Post is trying to better align its offerings with the preferences of readers.
shuttering the middle east bureau and the sports dept. who are these supposed readers? zionist nerds?
Lmao
Heartbreaking
Washed-ington Post 