this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
43 points (97.8% liked)

United Kingdom

6420 readers
208 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 24 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

In the photograph I noticed there's water either side of the road, so I looked it up on a map and it's such a dumb fucking stretch of road. Of course the sea will take it!

Why waste money rebuilding it over and over when they could make an inland road that serves the same route?

Highlighted the road in red for visibility.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 1 hour ago

Because that's a freshwater lake on the inland side with interesting wildlife. Letting the sea in is a big call.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Somebody aught Torcross that Strete and give that up Start a Slapton

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 3 points 13 hours ago

Dun Point fingers at them, they'll get Cross!

[–] Taiatari@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Doesn’t the road there serve as a barrier to protect the rest of the coast line behind it from erosion?

However, if that were the case why is it not a proper damn? Hmmmm

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That's a natural spit of land (there is another technical term if it has land at both ends I think?). It was there, and flat, so they built the road on it. It wasn't built for the road. (....probably)

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 8 hours ago

Aye, however reading this I'm even more convinced putting a road there is idiotic, considering the environmental uniqueness of the area.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slapton_Ley

But hey, who cares about tarmac, exhaust fumes, tyre microplastics, brake dust, and potential oil leaks and debris from accidents in a nature reserve and area of special scientific interest?

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 3 points 14 hours ago

Plus, the terrain near the coast here is an absolute bastard for point-to-point roads.
You'd struggle to make the alternative road any more efficient than the existing b-roads.

Looks like a landscape from Death Stranding.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 8 points 15 hours ago

I think I've seen worse potholes than that.

[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Hm, doesn't look much worse than some of the B roads i've driven there