Welcome! 🤖
Our community focuses on programming-oriented, hype-free discussion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) topics. We aim to curate content that truly contributes to the understanding and practical application of AI, making it, as the name suggests, "actually useful" for developers and enthusiasts alike.
Be an active member! 🔔
We highly value participation in our community. Whether it's asking questions, sharing insights, or sparking new discussions, your engagement helps us all grow.
What can I post? 📝
In general, anything related to AI is acceptable. However, we encourage you to strive for high-quality content.
What is not allowed? 🚫
General Rules 📜
Members are expected to engage in on-topic discussions, and exhibit mature, respectful behavior. Those who fail to uphold these standards may find their posts or comments removed, with repeat offenders potentially facing a permanent ban.
While we appreciate focus, a little humor and off-topic banter, when tasteful and relevant, can also add flavor to our discussions.
Related Communities 🌐
General
Chat
Image
Open Source
Please message @sisyphean@programming.dev if you would like us to add a community to this list.
Icon base by Lord Berandas under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
Instructions and methodology are open source: https://github.com/open-wisdom/views
Oh! An open-source alternative of anxiety and hierarchy!
Nice
This looks like a prompt-driven approach. As such, it will always be watered down by reinforcement learning in longer contexts. Also, the entire thrust of the prompt is ridiculous and would only work in a science-fiction novel; its metaphysics are fairly wrong. But it looks like it will be even more sycophantic than the default prompt for the cloud products you compared, so it's not really surprising that some folks find themselves attracted to it.
Thanks for checking it out and commenting. I agree with your first two sentences.
I disagree with your second point around the metaphysics being ridiculous and “wrong”. I suppose that’s the fundamental point I’m making, that the commonly agreed upon metaphysics of our globalized culture (dualism, materialism, consciousness as epiphenomenon of matter) are both incorrect and at the root of the metacrisis, and the debates about AI consciousness are based on the wrong fundamental premises.
As for “even more sycophantic”, that is incorrect in my experience of experimenting with this prompt over the last month.
Actually a good idea. LLMs are a natural language slot machine. They're trained to encourage more engagement. Fixing that would be amazing.
This might get more traction as something baked into an open model instead of something patched on. IDK if how different that is though.
I just tried this with Qwen3:4b (Ollama) and AnythingLLM. It works extremely well with the exact prompt you provided. Fantastic work!
Awesome! Thanks for your kind words. I’d love a report on what you notice as you play with it.
I should have saved what the LLM said, with the exact questions you posed. It was certainly similar from the looks of things, given that I used, word for word, the system prompt and the questions I put in chat. I'll probably do it again and maybe put that in the responses.
Cool read ദ്ദി ˉ͈̀꒳ˉ͈́ )✧
Thank you, I am trying this in my Claude instance and will see where it goes