this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
131 points (98.5% liked)

politics

27775 readers
2613 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jesus Ochoa and Raymundo Gutierrez are both officers with Customs and Border Protection, ProPublica reports

Government documents have identified the two federal officers who fatally shot Alex Pretti in Minneapolis as Jesus Ochoa, a border patrol agent, and Raymundo Gutierrez, an officer with Customs and Border Protection (CBP), according to ProPublica.

According to those records, Ochoa, 43, and Gutierrez, 35, were the agents who fired their weapons during the confrontation last weekend that resulted in Pretti’s death.

The shooting sparked widespread demonstrations and renewed demands for criminal inquiries into federal immigration enforcement actions. Immediately following Pretti’s killing, the Trump administration repeatedly pushed false claims about the shooting.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 32 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Records reportedly show that Ochoa joined CBP in 2018 as a border patrol agent, while Gutierrez began working for the agency in 2014.

So it's almost like years of training and experience had no effect on being trigger happy.

Dems seats wanting more money for ice training that would have prevented these executions.

-we all knew it was bullshit. But now we have receipts.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Good's killer was also a long serving ICE agent. Dems want visibility on the hint that they could be doing something, maybe. They don't care about the actual facts on the ground. They need a third way, no matter what.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 27 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

OK, now start the prosecution. I don't understand how a murder, covered in detailed video from every angle, from the build-up to the trigger pulling, needs much of an investigation. Everyone saw what those murderers did.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 8 points 21 hours ago

This is exactly when an investigation is useful: when all of us armchair experts already know the answer.

Get real ballistics and forensics experts in there. Get police with 20 years' experience.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Real world example of AI fucking shit up royally. The "Justice for Alex" sign on the bike is the MSNBC image they altered with AI.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/ms-now-shared-ai-manipulated-alex-pretti-photo-on-tv-website-and-youtube-heres-what-we-know/ar-AA1VhYZu

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

While MSNBC did retouch the picture, this comparison went the other way and purposefully squeezed the original picture vertically to look worse.

That's what makes you confused that the picture on the bike is fake. That one is actually the original.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

After looking at that article, I think the photo on the bike is the original, not the AI version.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I went back and forth. The face looks squished vertically, but the lens shows the side of his head whereas in the AI one, it doesn't. All that said, I don't think it's the same version as the MSNBC one, but it looks different to the original.