763
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 203 points 11 months ago

The fact that he's free speaks volumes about our failure "justice" system.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 98 points 11 months ago

Free is one thing. Fuckin duder is campaigning. Like what the actual fuck...

[-] mostNONheinous@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

He doesn’t deserve the title of Duder, and the title of Duder doesn’t deserve such a stain.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I would like to issue an apology to all Duders out there. I am sincerely sorry.

[-] mostNONheinous@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Thanks to your swift and sincere apology, your Duder status has been upheld. Duder on.

[-] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Not only that...there's a good chance he is going to WIN again. What the fuck is anything?

[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

Yes, and if he was locked up without due process, it would say something else.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

They lock people up without due process awaiting trial all the time though right?

[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Depends, there's certainly a good argument to be made that the bail system is flawed, etc. But trump was arraigned and is out on bail.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Yes you're right, I forgot about the bail part. And the bail system certainly is flawed. Generally aren't you not allowed to leave your state if you're out on bail?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

If he wasn't wealthy and white he'd be behind bars right now awaiting trial.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Due process does not mean, "scott free until there's a guilty verdict", you utter numpty. These aren't all civil charges.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Mamertine@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

The wheels of justice grind very slowly. The bigger the case, the longer it takes to build.

But yes, I'm getting impatient. There should be consequences for trying to overthrow the government.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sleepy555@lemmy.world 113 points 11 months ago

It sounds like one or two guys booing..? Falling for news like this is how you grow complacent and not have the voter turnout that you expect.

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 49 points 11 months ago
[-] sleepy555@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yes, it's all bullshit and it's designed in these ways for their target audience. I actually posted another similar one further down on this thread as well.

It's meant to cause division to drive outrage and profits, and everyone just gobbles it up.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 35 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Someone needs to get their hearing checked. The embedded video in the tweet clearly has many overlapping boos, both men and women.

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1728567448100569088/pu/vid/avc1/480x270/gMMdbNq-v4fYi52Q.mp4

[-] C126@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

I heard a mix of boos, cheering, and random noise. So you could make a headline that says either and it would still be "technically" true. The best kind of truth.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You didn’t report anything that wasn’t already reported. The booing is definitely more prominent.

And saying it was just one or two guys is just dumb.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 54 points 11 months ago

Title is misleading. There are definitely boos, but the headline makes is seem like a majority were boos vs a mix of boos and cheering.

[-] Chickens@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Video sounded like uproarious cheers mostly. It's a southern crowd.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 40 points 11 months ago

Steven Cheung, a spokesman for Trump, told a Newsweek editor in an email to "step away from your computer on a Saturday night and come to an event sometime to experience the electric Trump effect."

That troll is so far up his own ass it’s difficult to imagine how he still manages to be up Trump’s ass.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 25 points 11 months ago

Imagine being him and thinking, "Mm, yeah. I gotta be his promoter."

Then again, a former Trump Org finance person broke down in tears last week, because he's sad they got caught committing fraud, and it makes him stressed that there's all these lawyers and investigators poking around. Some of these people are beyond help.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] just_ducky_in_NH@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

The ratio of boos:cheers for any candidate is not worth reporting on.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

The rise of fascism is so passeé! /s

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 28 points 11 months ago

He should be in prison, not a football game.

[-] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 11 months ago

He'll want every attendee charged with high treason, no less.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Why were there any cheers?

[-] ericisshort@lemmy.world 74 points 11 months ago

Because there are still plenty of dipshits that inexplicably adore this fuckwad.

[-] wsweg@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

It’s also South Carolina. The “inexplicable” part is the lack of education and the resulting increased susceptibility to brainwashing

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago
[-] Mafflez@reddthat.com 18 points 11 months ago

You are surrounded be idiots. The average person is very stupid. Complacency is why we got Trump the first time. People sitting in their asses saying he won't win and then not bothering to vote or just tossing it away for the third party as a petty protest.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Lmao, Cheeto Man

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Former President Donald Trump was met with loud boos as he arrived at Williams-Brice Stadium in South Carolina on Saturday ahead of the Palmetto Bowl.

The former president was invited to watch the football game at the request of Governor Henry McMaster, who became Haley's successor after Trump named her U.S. ambassador to the United Nations in 2017.

The MAGA leader was greeted with audible boos as his black SUV was arriving at Williams-Brice Stadium on Saturday, according to video clips shared on X, formerly Twitter.

Simon Ateba, Chief White House Correspondent at Today News Africa, shared a video on X showing the crowd inside the stadium cheering and clapping for the former president.

Trump's stop in South Carolina comes amid potential key updates involving his criminal and civil trials that could tarnish his 2024 presidential campaign.

"Additional video from AP's Meg Kinnard captures the mix of cheers and boos when Trump + McMaster walked onto the field tonight for a quick appearance during halftime of the USC-Clemson football game," Byrd posted.


The original article contains 533 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Currens_felis@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago

I bet there are a lot of republicans at a South Carolina football game

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago

We don’t like using the (R) word around here. It’s degrading and dehumanizing. Best to call them mentally handicapped.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

The fact this chorrizo hasn't been shot yet is what surprised me the most. Or, you know, burned, stabbed, mangled... whatever.

[-] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

People who promise actual real change usually get shot when other options don't work. Trump is just more sewage.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
763 points (93.5% liked)

politics

19145 readers
4492 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS