this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
339 points (99.1% liked)

World News

52854 readers
2473 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 94 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nestle's long history of sacrificing infants for profits continues strong.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, Nestle's existence is a good reminder that, if there is a god out there, they're the sort of god that likes to burn ants with a magnifying glass.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yea, I came here to say Nestle is caught poisoning children? Again?

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

Again?

..it would appear so...

Filthy corporation.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So the entire C suite will be jailed for risking babies lives, right? RIGHT?

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The fine for this is less than the obscene profits they made, so no.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I want to live to see the day where Corporations do not have the ability to factor in fines as a "cost of doing business".

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Seriously. Fines need to eat into their profits at the bare minimum.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 5 points 4 hours ago

Minimum? No, I think fines should bankrupt the executives and board members, leaving them homeless at a minimum. If they don't want to have being homeless as a bad thing, maybe they should start donating to political candidates who would change society for the better and make homelessness either a thing of the past or a very well tended to position.

[–] digger@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Honestly there shouldn't even be a difference in our of court settlements.

A single death should pay out enough to be more expensive than a full recall. Even if the government gets the difference in fees as punishment for negligence.

[–] mriormro@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Hey, I watched this movie too!

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Is someone getting arrested?

[–] exothermic@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right? As if the bullshit they're pulling with water and chocolate weren't enough?

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

But think about how much shareholder they preserved!

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 3 points 4 hours ago

$200 a month? Man, he got off easy in this round of 'fuck the plebes' this year.

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 1 points 52 minutes ago

Reduced because I still haven't figured out how to keep Lemmy from posting GIFs and videos at maximum possible resolution in the comments TBH.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know, if I was the head of a multinational organization that's infamous for poisoning children, stealing water, and bribing officials... I'd be worried about my personal safety.

Ya know evil people, committing evil actions, count on good people doing nothing.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The head of just such an organization hires a lot of bodyguards.

But, as people tend to learn, the way to excise such a person from their bodyguards, is to remove the bodyguards one at a time.

[–] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 4 points 1 day ago

Well, if no one does anything about it then I guess it’s fine.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

They get a penny every time they are caught poisoning babies, and that pleases stockholders.