this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
42 points (97.7% liked)

News

37339 readers
64 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“These vehicles make dozens of trips back and forth from storage facilities … I have seen bodies in these trucks so stuck together it required strength to pull them apart. The blood was still fresh and dried up when they overcrowded them in piles.”

One witness at Behesht-e Sakineh, who was granted access to the site to look for the body of a friend, says he personally searched through hundreds of “stacked” bodies and was told by graveyard staff that they had “received thousands of bodies just in the past two days”.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is truly horrifying. Even more so that the world is watching it happen with precious little protest.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The next day, everything abruptly changed. Protesters kept coming, but their injuries were close-range gunshots and severe stab wounds, typically to the chest, eyes and genitals. Many proved fatal.

Jfc that's horrific. You know how you can tell when somebody feels emboldened because they escalate?

I find Trump's attacks on the Iranian government ridiculous. That's not because the Iranian government is in the right for slaughtering civilians or because the Iranian government shouldn't be held accountable. It's because as leader of the allegedly "free world," Trump has been setting the tone for other leaders to crack downs on free speech and human rights, since he stepped into office once again just over a year ago. His own behavior enables and emboldens this.

Knowing how everything else operates in this administration, the psychological manipulation layered into everything this administration is doing should never be discounted. To be clear, that doesn't mean that the violence at the protests in Iran is being overhyped, it means that it's almost certain that Trump (or more likely the billionaires and other people who actually direct Trump) are very aware that they are enabling this. Destabilization of other countries prior to a regime change (including your own) almost always relies on mass psychological operations, and pushing the population to carry out the bulk of the work for you by manipulating their behavior.

The people who used their money to get Trump elected would love to see the U.S. invade Iran, because they always profit from invasions. They see this situation as a double win. The U.S. government's crack down on rights of civilians in the U.S., emboldens the Iranian government to crack down even harder on it's own civilians. Not only does this chill dissent in the U.S., it provides a necessary pretext to do what Trump's been threatening to do in Iran.

Hypocritical? Yes, but do you think that matters? Even if you remain a member of the "reality based community," did that matter when it came to Iraq? Did it matter when it came to the Epstein files or Venezuela? These are lawless individuals out to serve themselves. They literally believe it is their job to create the reality, and we're just the NPCs that get to live in it.

The aide said that guys like me were 'in what we call the reality-based community,' which he defined as people who 'believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.' [...] 'That's not the way the world really works anymore,' he continued. 'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors...and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do'.

-One of these democracy hating oligarchs circa 2004.

In other words, these psychopaths truly believe they are gods among men, and we're all just ants under their magnifying glass. Hypocrisy, morality, none of that matters. All that matters to them is winning through exploitation and preserving their status at the top of the heirarchy.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Gee this all feels a whole lot like the media reports of WMDs leading up to the Iraq War. All the US and Israeli friendly media sure want us to feel a certain way about Iran based on what people said they saw.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

With an internet blackout, what do you think is happening? They aren't sitting down for tea to talk things out.

[–] x_pikl_x@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Swear all the ml losers figured out everyone ignored their instance and moved to this one instead.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Hard to say, but that doesn't mean we should automatically believe the tales of publications who have a history of manufacturing consent amongst the public which later turned out to be false. They did it in Iraq, they did it in Venezuela, and they'd gladly do it again in Iran.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

What would be a better source for this kind of information about Iran?

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I'm guessing you mean politicians who have a history of manufacturing consent? The Guardian generally has my respect. As do you.